Administration communale de Leudelange – Violation Found (Luxembourg, 2023)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données found that the Municipal Administration of Leudelange did not appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO) on time. This matters because public bodies must have a DPO to ensure they follow data protection rules. The administration appointed a DPO only after the investigation started.
What happened
The Municipal Administration of Leudelange failed to appoint a DPO by the required deadline.
Who was affected
Visitors and residents of Leudelange whose data may be managed by the municipality.
What the authority found
The authority ruled that the administration violated GDPR by not appointing a DPO and not providing the DPA with the DPO's contact details.
Why this matters
This case highlights the importance of timely compliance with data protection obligations for public bodies. Other municipalities should ensure they have a DPO in place to avoid similar issues.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
Following a general check carried on all Luxembourg municipalities in the summer of 2022, the Luxembourg DPA decided to open an investigation on the Municipal Administration of Leudelange (the controller). Specifically, the controller aimed to evaluate the controller’s conformity with its obligation to appoint a DPO and whether it communicated the DPO's contact details to the DPA, as provided by Article 37(1)(a) GDPR and Article 37(7) GDPR. The DPA noted that pursuant to the entry into force of the GDPR, public bodies were obliged to designate a DPO no later than 25 May 2018. Meanwhile, on the date the investigation was opened, and after consulting the register of DPOs, no DPO had been identified for the controller. The controller appointed a DPO only on 10 March 2023, namely after the opening of the investigation. Thus, the controller violated Article 37(1)(a) GDPR. Moreover, the DPA acknowledged that when the investigation began, the controller had not communicated to the DPA the contact details of the DPO, breaching Article 37(7) GDPR. Observing [https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/loi/2018/08/01/a686/jo Article 48 of the National Data Protection Law], the DPA may impose administrative fines as provided in Article 83 GDPR, except against the State or municipalities. Hence, the DPA found it appropriate to issue a reprimand to the controller under Article 58(2)(b) GDPR. In light of this, the DPA recognised that during the proceedings, the controller took steps to remedy the shortcomings identified by the head of the investigation.
Outcome
Violation Found
The DPA found a violation but did not impose a fine.
Related Enforcement Actions (0)
No other enforcement actions found for Administration communale de Leudelange in LU
This is the only recorded action for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Decision Date
24 July 2023
Authority
Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-7441About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Administration communale de Leudelange - Luxembourg (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: