- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- No confirmed legal basis recorded.
- Privacy topics
Public Prosecutor's Office of the Netherlands – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2019)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Dutch court ruled that a foundation's publication of a prosecutor's name and photo violated privacy laws. The court found the allegations against the prosecutor were inaccurate and published without consent. This case underscores the importance of verifying information before sharing it publicly.
What happened
The court ordered the removal of a blacklist article that included a public prosecutor's name and photo without consent.
Who was affected
A public prosecutor was affected by the publication of her name and photo in a blacklist article.
What the authority found
The court determined that the publication violated the prosecutor's rights and ordered its removal.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent for protecting individuals' privacy rights against inaccurate public claims, reminding organizations to ensure the accuracy of shared information.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Secondary-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 19 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
SIN-NL is a foundation that works to improve the position of victims of medical errors or their survivors and the patient safety and quality of healthcare. SIN-NL publishes online a blacklist of doctors and a blacklist of judges, which contain names of doctors, judges and other persons and organisations within the healthcare sector who according to SIN-NL act unlawfully. The plaintiff was a public prosecutor, that acted in cases of medical malpractice. The plaintiff's name and photo were included in an article in the list of the doctors and specific accusations against here were made. The name of the plaintiff's name and job were also mentioned there. The Public Prosecutor's Office claimed that the inclusion of the names and the photo violated the GDPR and the plaintiff's portrait right, hence they should be removed. The Court had to balance the interests of the opposing parties. The Court found that the allegations against the plaintiff were inaccurate. Moreover, the photo was published without the plaintiff's consent and thus it violated her portrait right. The paintiff also saw a violation of Articles 33, 35 and 36 of the GDPR, which the defendant has not contested. The Court found that the publication of the blacklists violated Dutch law and ordered the removal of the article at stake. It also ordered the defendants to submit a request for removal to Google.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Public Prosecutor's Office of the Netherlands in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
25 October 2019
Authority
DPA RbMidden-Nederland
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Public Prosecutor's Office of the Netherlands - Netherlands (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: