Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2019)

Court Ruling
DPA RbRotterdam12 December 2019Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam did not have to give a woman the DNA of a deceased man she claimed was her father. The court decided that the man's privacy and his wish for confidentiality outweighed the woman's interest in knowing her parentage. This case highlights the importance of respecting individuals' privacy wishes, even after death.

What happened

Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam refused to provide a woman with the DNA of a deceased man who participated in their research.

Who was affected

The woman claiming the deceased man was her father and the deceased man's privacy interests were affected.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the medical center was right to deny the DNA request, as the deceased man's consent was only for research purposes and not for disclosure to relatives.

Why this matters

This decision underscores the importance of honoring confidentiality agreements in medical research, even after a participant's death. It serves as a reminder to institutions to carefully consider consent forms and privacy obligations.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 9(2) GDPR
Decision AuthorityRb. Rotterdam
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff asked from the Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam (“EUMCR”) to provide her the DNA material of a person died in 2018 alleging that this person was her father. The deceased man had participated in a medical-scientific research at the EUMCR, prior to which he had filled in a “patient consent form”. According to this form, he expressed his wish that his body material would be treated confidentially. The EUMCR refused to provide the plaintiff the DNA material claiming that: * there is no legal basis under which it is obliged to provide this material, * the man’s wish had been expressed unambiguously, thus such a disclosure would contravene the GDPR and * it is bound by professional secrecy. The Court had to balance the plaintiff’s right to personality which includes her right to know her parents and the right of the deceased man and his family to privacy which is here protected by the EUMCR’s duty of confidentiality. The Court went through this balancing exercise and first invoked Recital 1 GDPR and Recital 4 GDPR and the definition of processing under Article 4(2) GDPR. Then, it noted that according to Article 9 GDPR and Recital 35 GDPR genetic data must be protected as sensitive data. The man’s consent to processing was only referred to the purposes of the research he participated in. Further, none of the requirements in Article 9(2) GDPR is fulfilled. The Court concluded that in this case the interest of the EUMCR must outweigh the plaintiff’s interest and the EUMCR must not provide her the DNA material. The Court rejected the plaintiff's claim.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

12 December 2019

Authority

DPA RbRotterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam - Netherlands (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: