Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
No confirmed legal basis recorded.

Court case G 72-74/2019 G 181-182/2019 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2019)

Court Ruling
DPA VfGH11 December 2019Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Austria's Constitutional Court ruled that a law allowing government hacking to monitor encrypted communications violates people's privacy rights. This decision is important because it protects citizens from invasive surveillance methods. Businesses should be aware of the legal limits on data collection and surveillance.

What happened

The court ruled that the law permitting government hacking for surveillance purposes is unconstitutional.

Who was affected

Citizens of Austria whose privacy rights are affected by government surveillance practices.

What the authority found

The court decided that the law infringes on fundamental rights to privacy and data protection.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for protecting privacy rights against invasive government surveillance. It reminds businesses to consider privacy implications in their operations.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 8 ECHR
§1 Austrian Data Protection Law (DSG)
Decision AuthorityVfGH

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Austria introduced [https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/bgbl/1975/631/P135a/NOR40202514 § 135a] of the criminal procedures act (StPO) to allow the use of spy software on devices ("government hacking") to be able to tap encrypted communication between smartphones. The mandatory data retention via license plate readers was also challenged before the Court. Members of the Parliament (Social Democrats and the Liberal Party) have applied to the Constitutional Court (VfGH) claiming that the law violates citizens' fundamental rights. The Court decided that the surveillance law that permits the use of spying software to read encrypted messages contravenes the fundamental rights to private life according to Article 8 ECHR, to data protection as foreseen in § 1 of the Austrian data protection act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG). The Court highlighted the difference between traditional wiretapping and modern computer systems which read encrypted messages. The latter provides insight into all areas of life allowing inferences about the user’s thoughts and preferences. Considering the particularities of the surveillance measure, this control mechanism was deemed to be not sufficient. The Court required an effective independent supervision by an institution which affords all appropriate technical means and human resources both at the beginning of the measure and the entire duration of the surveillance. The Court ruled that the recognition of licence plates, car types and driver pictures in a centralised database of the Ministry of Interior constitutes an indiscriminate data retention.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case G 72-74/2019 G 181-182/2019 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

11 December 2019

Authority

DPA VfGH

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case G 72-74/2019 G 181-182/2019 - Austria (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: