GGD Flevoland – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2019)

Court Ruling
DPA RbMidden-Nederland13 November 2019Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that the City Council should have allowed access to personal data related to a social support application. The court found that the City Council and other public entities were responsible for the data, but the data was destroyed after the application was denied. This case highlights the importance of data access rights under GDPR.

What happened

The City Council denied access to personal data related to a social support application, which was later destroyed.

Who was affected

The person who applied for social support and whose personal data was processed and then destroyed.

What the authority found

The court decided that the City Council should have granted access to the personal data, but the refusal was legitimate since the data was destroyed.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for public entities to manage personal data access requests properly and highlights the shared responsibility among joint controllers. It serves as a reminder for entities to maintain data integrity and availability.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 15 GDPR
Art. 4(7) GDPR
Decision AuthorityRvS
Reviewed AuthorityRb. Midden-Nederland (Netherlands)
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The claimant’s son applied for social support at home. Following the application, the City Public Health Department investigated and addressed a recommendation on whether the social support should be granted to the City Council. The City Council decided to not grant the social support. Then, the claimant requested a copy of the files processed during the application process, including the son's personal data related to his medical files. The City Council refused to grant the access. Who is the relevant controller? The Court first considered that all public entities involved in the application process and not only the City Council were joint controllers. Thus, the access request regarding the personal data could have been sent to the City Public Health Department as well. Then, the Court considered that the access to the personal data should have been granted by the City Council under the data protection law. However, the City Council already destroyed the personal data after it refused to grant the social support. Therefore, the Court considered that the refusal was legitimate.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for GGD Flevoland in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 November 2019

Authority

DPA RbMidden-Nederland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. GGD Flevoland - Netherlands (2019). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: