Court case 3L 1028.19 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA VGBerlin28 February 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Berlin decided that a school could keep a student's record even after he transferred to another school. The court found that the records still served a purpose for the school's tasks. This ruling shows that schools can retain records if they are still needed for educational purposes.

What happened

A Berlin court ruled that a school could keep a student's record despite his transfer because the records still served an educational purpose.

Who was affected

The student whose school record contained notes about his behavior and was not deleted after he changed schools.

What the authority found

The court held that the school did not need to delete the record as it still served a purpose under the school's regulations.

Why this matters

This case clarifies that schools can retain student records if they are necessary for ongoing educational purposes. It highlights the balance between privacy rights and institutional needs.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 17(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 17(1)(d) GDPR
Decision AuthorityVG Berlin
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff visited a school in Berlin where a record with notes from teachers about his behavior was created. The school record contains his insulting statements to classmates and teachers and notes because of disrupted teaching. The student changes the school recently. Were the requirements of Article 17 GDPR fulfilled and would the defendant require to delete the school record? Article 17 (1) (a) GDPR grants a right to delete personal data, if the purpose for which the personal data was collected no longer exists and further storage is no longer necessary. The court did not see such a loss of purpose in this case. The VG held the applicable school regulation against the student and his parents. It stipulates that a change of school does not justify a loss of purpose. According to the school regulation the processing of personal data relating to pupils and legal guardians is necessary for the school to perform its tasks. This applies in particular to students' breaches of duty in order to be able to take the appropriate pedagogical measures and compare them with their effects in the past. The concerned school record shall be kept during the mandatory school period according to the school regulation. Since the student is still obliged to go to school, it can be assumed that the documents collected will continue to serve their purpose. Furthermore, the applicants have not made it credible that the personal data within the meaning of Article 17 (1) (d) GDPR were processed illegally.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 3L 1028.19 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

28 February 2020

Authority

DPA VGBerlin

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 3L 1028.19 - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: