Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Stichting De Huismeesters – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA GHARL28 April 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that Stichting De Huismeesters could not share personal data about a tenant who was evicted for growing cannabis. This decision is important because it clarifies how personal information can be handled in eviction cases. It shows that just because someone is evicted, it doesn't mean their personal data can be freely shared.

What happened

Stichting De Huismeesters was found to have improperly planned to share a tenant's personal data after eviction for cannabis cultivation.

Who was affected

The tenant who was evicted for growing cannabis in her rental home.

What the authority found

The court decided that the eviction reason did not count as data related to criminal convictions, allowing the housing corporation to record it without sharing it.

Why this matters

This ruling sets a precedent for how personal data related to evictions can be treated. Companies should be cautious about sharing personal information without clear legal grounds.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 10 GDPR
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 10(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityGHARL

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The housing department of Groningen has a policy according to which the renting agreement can be terminated where the tenants were found to cultivate cannabis in the place allocated to them. They are then put on a list where they are banned from applying to a new housing during 3 years. The Appellant was evicted from her rental home because of her cannabis plants, a record of which was made by the housing corporation, followed by a 5-year prohibition for the Appellant to rent homes. Her personal data along with the reason for the contract termination (cannabis cultivation) was supposed to be shared with other local organizations and housing corporations according to the agreement against home cultivation of cannabis. On 17 November 2015 the Court of First Instance ruled, among others, in favor of the Appellant’s objection against the sharing of her data according to the agreement and reduced the 5-year prohibition to 2 years. Both Appellant and the Huismeersters Foundation appealed this decision in the Court of Appeals on several points. One tenant was expelled from his house on this basis and considered that the processing of his data was not compliant with the GDPR. The controller put forward Article 6(1)(b), (c) and (f) GDPR as potential legal bases. Main questions from data protection perspective were: • Is the Huismeestes Foundation allowed to share (personal) data of Appellant with other participants of the agreement because Apellant has been evicted from her social rental home due to a hemp farm? • Does a record of the reason of eviction (cannabis) constitute data relating to criminal convictions and offences according to Article 10 GDPR? The Court ruled that the record of the reason of eviction does not constitute data relating to criminal convictions and offences. In this case the record was made by assigning code 2 (2=cannabis) in the field “reason of registration”. According to the Court, this simply marks cannabis being grown in the rental home

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Stichting De Huismeesters in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

28 April 2020

Authority

DPA GHARL

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Stichting De Huismeesters - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: