Court case AWB - 19 _ 1687 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbMidden-Nederland29 May 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that a company must do more than just add a new report to fix errors in a person's medical records. The court said the company should make sure its systems can clearly correct mistakes, not just add extra documents. This decision highlights the importance of properly addressing data inaccuracies to meet GDPR standards.

What happened

A court found that adding a new report was not enough to correct inaccuracies in a person's medical records.

Who was affected

A person whose medical records contained factual inaccuracies that were not properly corrected.

What the authority found

The court decided that the company must take better steps to ensure accurate data correction, as required by GDPR.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that companies must have effective systems to correct data errors, beyond just adding new documents. It serves as a reminder for businesses to review their data correction processes to comply with GDPR.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 16 GDPR
Art. 24 GDPR
Decision AuthorityRb. Midden-Nederland
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff complained about factual inaccuracies in reports on his medical situation and possibilities for performing work in the context of granting a work benefit. He requested rectification of data in these reports. The defendant claimed it corrected the inaccuracies by issuing a new report but the plaintiff found this not sufficient since the inaccuracies remain in the initial reports and alleged violation of his right to rectification. The Court had to assess the way in which the rectification should be carried out by the defendant considering also its technical capacity. The District Court invoked Article 24 and Recital 78 GDPR and concluded that data controllers must take appropriate technical and organisational measures that are necessary to ensure that the requirements of GDPR are met. It found that an additional report cannot be considered sufficient to fulfill the right to rectification. The controller must use its best efforts to ensure that policies and systems are in line with the GDPR including transparent and clearly recognisable rectification of inaccuracies other than merely adding a document in a medical file. The Court ordered the controller to investigate the possibilities of complying with the right to rectification within six weeks and notify the Court if it will make use of this opportunity within two weeks.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case AWB - 19 _ 1687 in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

29 May 2020

Authority

DPA RbMidden-Nederland

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case AWB - 19 _ 1687 - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: