Enforcing jurisdiction
France · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Ligue des droits de l'Homme – Court Ruling (France, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA TAVersailles26 June 2020France
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A French court ruled on the use of thermal cameras in schools to monitor body temperature during the pandemic. The court decided that even though the cameras don't record data, the information they gather is still considered personal data. This ruling emphasizes the importance of protecting personal data, even in health-related situations.

What happened

The court assessed the legality of using thermal cameras in schools to monitor temperatures.

Who was affected

Teachers and students in Lisses whose body temperatures were monitored by thermal cameras.

What the authority found

The court held that the data collected by thermal cameras constitutes personal data and must comply with GDPR.

Why this matters

This case highlights the need for careful consideration of privacy when implementing health monitoring technologies. Organizations should ensure compliance with data protection laws when using such tools.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 7 GDPR
Art. 8 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(a) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(g) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(h) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 4(1) GDPR
Art. 4(2) GDPR
Art. 7(GDPR)
Art. 8(GDPR)
Art. 9(1) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(a) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(g) GDPR
Art. 9(2)(h) GDPR
Art. 35(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
L 521-2 Code of Administrative Justice
Decision AuthorityCE
Reviewed AuthorityTA Versailles (France)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 23 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The NGO « Ligue des droits de l’Homme » brought an action for interim measures under L 521-2 of the code of Administrative justice (“CAJ”), before the administrative judge of first instance of Versailles to remove fixe and portable thermal cameras installed in Lisses’ municipal offices and used in the entrance of schools to monitor the body temperature of agents and citizens. The NGO also required to suspend the execution of the decision allowing the installation of both kinds (fixed and portable cameras). After confirming that the GDPR applied, the judge of first instance issued an order rejecting the request. Thus, the NGO appealed the order before the Council of State (Conseil d’Etat) and requested mainly to annul the order, grant its request at first instance and enjoin the city of Lisses to adopt any appropriate measure to indicate that the processing of body temperature remains optional, under Art. L 521-2 CAJ. By virtue of Art. 521-2 CAJ, the interim relief judge may order any measures necessary to safeguard a fundame The supreme Court had to assess whether the right to the protection of personal data included in the right to privacy, constitute a fundamental freedom within the meaning of L 521-1 CAJ. Thus, if the judge could enjoin the city of Lisses to suspend the execution of its decision and remove the thermal cameras. Although the portable thermal cameras do not record personal data, the judge clarified that the decision based on the information captured by the thermal cameras must be regarded as a processing, within the meaning of Art. 4 GDPR. Indeed, the city report to the teachers and pupils the need to leave the school depending on the highness of the body temperatures captured. Furthermore, the judge held that the body temperature was accurate enough to identify individuals and must be regarded as a sensitive personal data under the GDPR. Regarding the lawfulness, the judge rejected all the legal bases claimed by the city and hold that the

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Ligue des droits de l'Homme in FR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

26 June 2020

Authority

DPA TAVersailles

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Ligue des droits de l'Homme - France (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: