Court case 1 BvR 1873/13, 1 BvR 2618/13 (Bestandsdatenauskunft II) – Court Ruling (Germany, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA BVerfG27 May 2020Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Germany's Federal Constitutional Court found that parts of the telecommunications law violated privacy rights. The court said the rules on how authorities access customer data were too broad and not specific enough. This decision highlights the importance of protecting personal data and ensuring laws are clear and proportional.

What happened

The court found that the rules for how authorities access customer data were too broad and violated privacy rights.

Who was affected

Individuals whose personal data, like subscriber information, could be accessed by authorities under the telecommunications law.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the telecommunications law's provisions on data access were unconstitutional because they were not specific or proportional enough.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for clear and specific laws when it comes to accessing personal data. It serves as a reminder for lawmakers to ensure privacy protections are strong and well-defined.

National Law Articles

Art 113 TKG
Art 2 (1) GG
Art 1 (1) GG
Art 10 (1) GG
Decision AuthorityBVerfG
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Two individuals, plus approx. 6000 formally joining, brought constitutional complaints (Verfassungsbeschwerde) to the court, claiming that the challenged provisions of national law were violating their basic rights of informational self-determination and their right to privacy of telecommunications as guaranteed by the German constitution. Whether the challenged provisions regulating transfer and access of specific types of customer data (Bestandsdaten) to and by federal authorities are constitutional or too far reaching and hence violating basic rights. The court held that § 113 of the telecommunications act (Telekommunikationsgesetz – TKG) regulating the transfer of customer data from telecommunication and internet service providers as well as several other provisions governing authorities’ access rights are incompatible with Art 2 (1) in conjunction with Art 1 (1) and Art 10 (1) of the German constitution (Basic Law – Grundgesetz – GG) for lack of consideration of the principle of proportionality. In particular, the bases for requiring transfer and access are not sufficiently specific and must be proportionate in relation to the type of data requested, including purpose limitation. The data in question is primarily so-called subscriber data (Bestandsdaten), referring to data linked to the conclusion or performance of a contract, as opposed to traffic and content data.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 1 BvR 1873/13, 1 BvR 2618/13 (Bestandsdatenauskunft II) in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

27 May 2020

Authority

DPA BVerfG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 1 BvR 1873/13, 1 BvR 2618/13 (Bestandsdatenauskunft II) - Germany (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: