Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case 8598127 KK EXPL 20-357 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2020)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam22 July 2020Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Dutch court ruled that a bank must remove negative credit codes for a person who faced unfortunate circumstances. This is important because it shows that individuals can challenge their credit history if they can prove their situation. The decision highlights the need for banks to consider personal circumstances when processing data.

What happened

The bank refused to remove negative credit codes despite the individual's request and explanation of their situation.

Who was affected

The individual whose credit history was negatively impacted by the bank's records.

What the authority found

The court found that the bank could process data under legitimate interests but ruled in favor of the individual due to their circumstances.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that companies must consider personal situations when handling sensitive data. Businesses should be mindful of how their data practices affect individuals, especially in sensitive areas like credit.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5 GDPR
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(GDPR)
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

An individual had a credit history with the bank, at the term of which he could pay his debts due to reasons for which he cannot be held responsible. the bank registered his name under several codes at the BKR. The individual asks for the removing his data from the BKR. the bank refuses to send this request. the balance of interest was to be assessed, between the interests of the users not to be registered, and the interest of the society (banks and credit agencies) to assess the profile of their customers. The tribunal confirmed that the data could be processed under the legitimate interest basis (ARTICLE 6(1)(f) GDPR). The tribunal weighted the different interests at stake and decided in favor of the complainant since he could prove that his bad credit scoring was due to unfortunate circumstances. The tribunal order the bank to request the BKR to remove several codes under which the plaintiff as registered.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 8598127 KK EXPL 20-357 in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

22 July 2020

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 8598127 KK EXPL 20-357 - Netherlands (2020). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: