Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case W256 2235360-1 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA BVwG1 September 2025Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruling allowed the Public Employment Service in Austria to use a model that predicts jobseekers' chances of finding work, despite concerns about profiling. This decision is significant as it clarifies the legal boundaries for using personal data in employment services.

What happened

The court ruled that the Public Employment Service could process personal data for its jobseeker assessment model.

Who was affected

Jobseekers whose personal characteristics were used in the assessment model.

What the authority found

The court annulled the DPA's prohibition, stating that the processing was allowed under national law.

Why this matters

This case sets a precedent for how profiling can be used in employment contexts. Companies developing similar tools should ensure they comply with legal requirements.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 22(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 22(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityBVwG

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Public Employment Service (the controller) is a body responsible for implementing the federal government’s labour market policy. The controller developed a model for calculating jobseekers’ labour market opportunities (“AMAS”), as a tool for advisors to use in assessing jobseekers’ labour opportunities. This model uses data subjects’ personal characteristics (e.g. age, gender, education, previous career) to predict their future chances of integrating into the labour market. The controller planned on making its use mandatory from 2021 onwards. However, it also implemented measures to ensure that AMAS was used as a secondary opinion only; for example, advisors were trained to use AMAS and assess labour market opportunities independently. Advisors were also obliged to explain data subjects the conclusions reached by AMAS, and discuss any possible concerns. The DPA initiated an ex officio investigation, and prohibited the controller from processing personal data using AMAS because the controller did not have a suitable legal basis. Furthermore, the processing was profiling within the meaning of Article 4(4) GDPR, and the prohibition of automated decision-making under Article 22 GDPR applied in any case. The controller appealed the decision to the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG), who annulled the decision of the DPA. According to the BVwG, the controller is allowed to carry out this processing of personal data in accordance with national law. The DPA appealed the case to the Supreme Administrative Court (VwGH)You can read the GDPRhub summary here: VwGH - Ro 2021/04/0010-11. The VwGH stated that there was a possibility that AMAS constituted automated decision-making within the meaning of Article 22(1) GDPR. This was the task of the BVwG to investigate; according to the VwGH, the processing would be prohibited if there was automated decision-making unless the exceptions under Article 22(2) GDPR were met. The Court first stated that AMAS engaged in profiling in

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W256 2235360-1 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

1 September 2025

Authority

DPA BVwG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W256 2235360-1 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: