Court case 842/16.5T8ALQ.L1-3 – Court Ruling (Portugal, 2017)
Court ruling (pre-GDPR, Directive 95/46/EC)
This national court ruling predates the GDPR and interprets earlier data protection law. It is excluded from cookie statistics and the Risk Calculator.
A Portuguese court ruled that using radar to capture speeding vehicles does not violate privacy rights. The court found that photographing a car's license plate for road safety is legal. This decision supports the use of technology to enforce traffic laws without infringing on personal privacy.
What happened
A driver was fined for speeding based on radar evidence, which they claimed violated their privacy.
Who was affected
The driver who was caught speeding and photographed by the radar system.
What the authority found
The court ruled that using radar to capture vehicle speed and license plates is legal and does not violate privacy rights.
Why this matters
This case confirms that technology can be used for public safety without breaching privacy, reassuring authorities about the legality of traffic enforcement methods.
National Law Articles
In the case of a public interest (road safety), it is appropriate and proportionate to monitor the speed at which cars travel, through a registration of the speed with a radar, including a photograph of the vehicle license plate, which will only be used if necessary for the purposes of criminal or administrative fining proceedings. There is no interference on the constitutionally protected right to privacy or intimacy, inasmuch as the image collected by a radar is directed at the vehicle, and, more specifically, at its license plate, while the driver is not visible nor identifiable. A driver was caught speeding and was issued an administrative fine of inhibition of driving for a period of 90 days. The driver appealed the decision to the Court of First Instance, considering her/his right to privacy was violated by being photographed by a speeding radar. That meant that having her/his photograph taken and used as proof in the proceedings should be considered illegally obtained evidence. Also, the driver considered that there was no evidence that the radar had been registered and approved by the data protection authority (CNPD), as is legally required, and so, the radar infringed the national data protection law. The Court of First Instance upheld the administrative decision. The driver, then, appealed to the Appeal Court. The data protection authority, CNPD, is responsible for giving opinions, controlling and inspecting compliance with legal and regulatory provisions regarding the treatment and protection of personal data, as per article 23 of Act 67/98, of 26 October. In accordance with the provisions of article 3, a) of this Act, personal data is “any information, of any nature and regardless of the respective support, including sound and image, relating to the identified or identifiable natural person who may have data be identified, directly or indirectly, namely by reference to an identification number or to one or more specific elements of their physical,
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 842/16.5T8ALQ.L1-3 in PT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
17 May 2017
Authority
Commission Nationale pour la Protection des Données
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-court-3425About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 842/16.5T8ALQ.L1-3 - Portugal (2017). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: