Enforcing jurisdiction
Slovenia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case VSRS Sodba IV Ips 2/2021 – Court Ruling (Slovenia, 2021)

Court Ruling
Informacijski pooblaščenec16 March 2021Slovenia
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Slovenia ruled on a case involving the unauthorized disclosure of personal data by a prosecutor. The prosecutor shared the personal information of 32 individuals without permission. This case highlights the need for strict adherence to data protection laws, even for government officials.

What happened

A prosecutor disclosed personal data of 32 individuals without a legal basis.

Who was affected

Thirty-two individuals whose personal data was disclosed by a prosecutor.

What the authority found

The Slovenian DPA determined that the prosecutor violated local data protection laws by making unauthorized disclosures.

Why this matters

This ruling underscores the importance of data protection compliance for public officials. It serves as a reminder that everyone, including government employees, must respect privacy laws.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 83 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 83(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Article 1&2 of the Minor Offences Act (ZP-1)
Article 91 of the Personal Data Protection Act (ZVOP-1)
Decision AuthorityVSRS
Reviewed AuthorityIP (Slovenia)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The applicant is an official for the Supreme State Prosecutor's Office. From March and June 2017, the applicant disclosed the personal data of thirty-two data subjects without a legal basis in Slovenian law and without the consent of these data subjects. The Slovenian DPA (Information Commissioner or IP) defined the applicant's disclosures as a repeated violation of the first paragraph of Article 8 of the Slovenian Personal Data Protection Act (ZVOP-1). The IP further determined that the applicant had committed thirty-two offenses under Article 91 of the ZVOP-1. As a result, the Slovenian IP invoked domestic criminal regulating misdemeanor offenses (called the Minor Offenses Act or ZP-1) to impose on the applicant a fine of EUR 830 for each offense, as well as an additional EUR 2,380 sanction. Slovenia remains the only EU country which has not passed a national act implementing the GDPR. The Slovenian legal system does not allow for the issuing of administrative fines by agencies such as a DPA, which means that even courts cannot initiate proceedings. This should not be a barrier to the implementation of the GDPR because Article 83(9) creates an exception for such countries that do not provide administrative fines, allowing them to impose fines through competent national courts. Slovenia negligently failed to invoke this exception at the time of adoption of the GDPR, and instead continues to rely on ZVOP-1 for data protection. In summary, in Slovenia there is no entity that can impose administrative fines as prescribed by the GDPR, but the DPA can at least impose at least misdemeanor fines under ZVOP-1. ZVOP-1 gives the Slovenian DPA the power to directly issue misdemeanor fines through the procedural rules defined by the Minor Offenses Act (ZP-1). ZVOP-1 also sets maximum limits on the fines that the DPA can impose: €1 million for large companies, €300,000 for smaller companies, and €20,000 for individuals. These maximum fines are significantly lower than

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case VSRS Sodba IV Ips 2/2021 in SI

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

16 March 2021

Authority

Informacijski pooblaščenec

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case VSRS Sodba IV Ips 2/2021 - Slovenia (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: