Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case W214 2219800-3 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2021)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde26 April 2021Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court ruled that a government agency must delete an old identity card photo but can keep a new one while it's valid. This decision is important because it clarifies how long personal data can be stored. It helps people understand their rights regarding their personal information.

What happened

The court ruled that the agency must delete a photograph from a blocked identity card but can keep the photo from a valid identity card.

Who was affected

A person who lost their identity card and requested the deletion of their old photo.

What the authority found

The court determined that while personal data can be stored during the validity of an identity document, the old photo must be deleted.

Why this matters

This ruling helps define the limits of data retention for identity documents, guiding agencies on how to handle personal data responsibly.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 77 GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(c) GDPR
Art. 5(1)(e) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 77(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 22a PassG 1992
§ 22b PassG 1992
§ 22c PassG 1992
Decision AuthorityBVwG
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller issues identity cards and passports. The data transmitted for this purpose are in any case stored for the duration of the validity of the identity documents. The data subject reported losing an identity card ("old ID"), which was subsequently blocked. He then applied for a new identity card ("new ID") using the same photograph, which was still valid at the time of the decision. The photograph relating to the new ID was still stored at the time of the decision. The same photograph was also stored in the data set of the old ID, even though it had been blocked for more than three years. In a complaint to the Austrian DPA (DSB), the data subject requested, among other things, the deletion of these photographs. The DSB did not follow the data subject in this respect. The data subject filed an appeal against this with the Austrian Federal Administrative Court (BVwG). The BVwG ruled, among other things, that the controller is obliged to delete the photograph relating to the old ID. However, during the period of validity of an identity document, photographs may be stored. = The court first dealt with the question of whether photographs are biometric data within the meaning of Article 4(14) GDPR. In this regard, it stated that photographs serve to uniquely identify the person to whom the identity document is issued. This does not change if queries from the identity document register are carried out according to other criteria. In the end, however, the court leaves the qualification as biometric data open, since their processing would in any case be lawful under Article 9(2)(g) GDPR. The processing of biometric data was provided for at the statutory level by the Austrian Passport Act 1992 (PassG) for reasons of substantial public interest. = The court stated that there was no obligation to delete the data concerning the new identity card. Such obligation cannot exist during the period of validity of the identity card. After the expiry of the validity, § 22

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W214 2219800-3 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

26 April 2021

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W214 2219800-3 - Austria (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: