Max Schrems – Court Ruling (Austria, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court partially ruled on a case involving Max Schrems and Facebook, focusing on how Facebook uses personal data for advertising. The court is waiting for further guidance from the European Court of Justice on some issues. This case is important because it challenges how big tech companies handle user data.
What happened
The Austrian court ruled on some parts of Max Schrems' case against Facebook, concerning data use for advertising.
Who was affected
The affected individuals are Facebook users whose personal data is used for targeted advertising.
What the authority found
The court is seeking guidance from the European Court of Justice on whether Facebook's data practices comply with GDPR.
Why this matters
This case could set a precedent for how tech companies use personal data for advertising. Businesses should watch for the final ruling to understand potential changes in data handling requirements.
GDPR Articles Cited
In the proceedings, the plaintiff filed a total of 12 applications. The court ruled on 6 of these applications by partial judgment of 23 June 2021. The proceedings were interrupted with regard to the remaining 5 applications until the CJEU has ruled on the preliminary ruling proceedings initiated by order of 23 June 2021. An overall short summary can be found [https://noyb.eu/en/breaking-austrian-ogh-asks-cjeu-if-facebook-undermines-gdpr-2018 here]. This order for preliminary ruling only concerns applications 5 to 9, so that only the relevant facts are presented in a very abbreviated form below. The facts relevant for the proceedings already decided by partial judgment are presented there. The plaintiff is Max Schrems. The defendant is Facebook Ireland. Facebook provides a platform on which more than 2.2 billion users worldwide can upload data and respond to data uploaded by other users. This includes text posts, pictures, videos, events, comments, "likes", tags on photos and much more. The court explains all the functions of the Facebook platform. In particular, it explains that users network with each other in so-called "friendships". Practically all information from all users is linked to each other - especially via the friendship network. This linking allows an evaluation of the individual user beyond the data provided by the user himself. The research into the "preferences" and the "profile" of the users does not only include interests or information provided by the user himself, but all personal data available to the defendant. Facebook does not generate any content itself and only provides the infrastructure (free of charge). Facebook receives the (linked) personal data. The economic model of the defendant is to generate revenue through personalised advertising and commercial content based on the same preferences and interests. For this purpose, Facebook provides so-called business tools, which in turn can be differentiated into three tools described by the
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Max Schrems in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Max Schrems - Austria (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: