Court case 2021-07 – Court Ruling (Norway, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Norwegian credit rating agency checked someone's credit without permission, but the data wasn't shared further. The person complained, but the privacy authority initially closed the case without telling them. The appeal board later decided the person had the right to appeal the closure. This case highlights the importance of transparency in handling privacy complaints.
What happened
A credit rating agency conducted an unauthorized credit check on an individual.
Who was affected
An individual who was subject to an unauthorized credit check by a credit rating agency.
What the authority found
The Norwegian Privacy Appeal Board ruled that the individual had the right to appeal the closure of their complaint about the unauthorized credit check.
Why this matters
This case highlights the need for transparency and communication from privacy authorities when handling complaints. It reinforces individuals' rights to be informed and appeal decisions affecting their personal data.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
The data subject lodged a complaint with the the Norwegian DPA (Datatilsynet) stating that they had been subject to an unauthorized credit rating. An employee of the credit rating agency has indeed triggered a credit check on the complainant to contact them in private matter. However, the data was not disclosed to other parties. Therefore, the DPA found it unlikely that data protection legislation had been violated and decided not to investigate the case further. The complainant, however, was neither informed of the closure of the case nor of their right to appeal by the DPA, but only after asking for the status of the investigation and performing own online research. The complainant therefore appealed the DPA's decision to dismiss the case, which was rejected and submitted to the Norwegian Privacy Appeal Board by the DPA. The Appeal Board decided that according to national law a party is granted the right to appeal to an individual decision. The DPAs decision to terminate the case without deciding whether the complainant's personal data has been processed unlawfully must be regarded as a decision that is decisive for the complainants individual rights, granting them the right to appeal according to [https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1967-02-10/KAPITTEL_6#%C2%A728 section 28(1)], [https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1967-02-10/KAPITTEL_1#%C2%A72 2(1)(a)(b)] [https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1967-02-10/ Public Administration Act]. Furthermore, the Board pointed to the data subject’s right to receive information on the outcome of the complaint under Article 77(2) GDPR and Article 57(1)(f) GDPR. The case was therefore returned to the DPA for an assessment on the merits of the case.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 2021-07 in NO
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 2021-07 - Norway (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: