- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Norway · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 2021-07 – Court Ruling (Norway, 2021)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A complaint was made to Norway's data protection authority about an unauthorized credit check by a credit rating agency. The agency did not share the data with anyone else, so the authority decided not to investigate further. However, the complainant was not informed about the case's closure, raising concerns about communication from data protection authorities.
What happened
The data protection authority received a complaint about an unauthorized credit check on a person.
Who was affected
The affected person was the individual who had the credit check performed on them without their consent.
What the authority found
The authority concluded that there was no violation of data protection laws since the data was not disclosed to others.
Why this matters
This case highlights the importance of communication from data protection authorities to individuals about their complaints. It also shows that not all complaints lead to investigations if no violation is found.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject lodged a complaint with the the Norwegian DPA (Datatilsynet) stating that they had been subject to an unauthorized credit rating. An employee of the credit rating agency has indeed triggered a credit check on the complainant to contact them in private matter. However, the data was not disclosed to other parties. Therefore, the DPA found it unlikely that data protection legislation had been violated and decided not to investigate the case further. The complainant, however, was neither informed of the closure of the case nor of their right to appeal by the DPA, but only after asking for the status of the investigation and performing own online research. The complainant therefore appealed the DPA's decision to dismiss the case, which was rejected and submitted to the Norwegian Privacy Appeal Board by the DPA. The Appeal Board decided that according to national law a party is granted the right to appeal to an individual decision. The DPAs decision to terminate the case without deciding whether the complainant's personal data has been processed unlawfully must be regarded as a decision that is decisive for the complainants individual rights, granting them the right to appeal according to [https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1967-02-10/KAPITTEL_6#%C2%A728 section 28(1)], [https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1967-02-10/KAPITTEL_1#%C2%A72 2(1)(a)(b)] [https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/1967-02-10/ Public Administration Act]. Furthermore, the Board pointed to the data subject’s right to receive information on the outcome of the complaint under Article 77(2) GDPR and Article 57(1)(f) GDPR. The case was therefore returned to the DPA for an assessment on the merits of the case.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 2021-07 in NO
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 2021-07 - Norway (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: