Court case 200.254.914 – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2021)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A Dutch court ruled against a writer's request to have Google remove search results linking to a plagiarism dispute. The court found that the search results were accurate and relevant, and Google's interest in keeping them accessible outweighed the writer's request for removal. This case highlights the balance between privacy and public interest in online information.
What happened
A court ruled against a writer's request to have Google remove search results related to a plagiarism dispute.
Who was affected
A writer who wanted search results about a plagiarism dispute removed from Google.
What the authority found
The court decided that the search results were accurate and relevant, and Google's interest in keeping them accessible outweighed the writer's privacy concerns.
Why this matters
This decision illustrates the ongoing challenge of balancing individual privacy rights with the public's interest in accessing information online. It serves as a reminder that not all requests for data removal will be granted if the information is deemed relevant and accurate.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
On 22 May 2018, complainant, who is a writer, requested Google via a to remove ten search-results that appeared when someone would type in complainant's name via Google Search. The search-results refer to webpages that display a conflict between complainant and a literary critic, since the latter accused complainant of plagiarism and (the accompanying) unjustified use of academic titles. After Google rejected the request, complainant asked the District Court Midden-Nederland to order google to remove the references to the ten internet addresses on pain of a penalty payment. This Court decided that complainant insufficiently refuted Google's argument that the contested search results are correct, relevant and not excessive, and also because it has not been established that the processing takes longer than necessary. The Court furthermore ruled that the interest of Google and of internet users who may want to gain access to the search results prevails over the interest of complainant. Complainant appealed against this judgement. Before the Court decided on the legitimacy of the deletion request, it assessed whether the applicable legislative instrument is the GDPR, or the (Dutch) Personal Data Protection Act (Wbp). It asserted that the legal proceedings started on 25 May 2018, and Article 48(10) of the General Data Protection Implementing Act (UAVG) states that the Wbp continuous to apply to proceedings that were pending before 25 May 2018 (the date the GDPR entered into force). However, it concluded that the GDPR is the applicable legislative instrument in this case, since the request concerns a request for removal, in respect of which it must be assessed ex nunc whether the processing is (currently) in accordance with the applicable rules. Then, the Court stated that the request for deletion must be regarded as an appeal to Article 21(1) GDPR, and the Court must therefore conduct the balancing test. In this regard, it acknowledged that complainant had an inte
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 200.254.914 in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 200.254.914 - Netherlands (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: