Court case 2 C 133/21 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2021)
A German court ruled that a company promoting FFP2 masks sent a marketing email to a lawyer without consent. The court found this violated GDPR rules because the company didn't have a valid reason to use the lawyer's email for advertising. This case highlights the importance of obtaining clear consent before sending marketing emails.
What happened
A company sent a marketing email about FFP2 masks to a lawyer without obtaining their consent.
Who was affected
The lawyer who received the unsolicited marketing email from the company.
What the authority found
The court decided the company violated GDPR by using the lawyer's email for marketing without a valid legal basis, such as consent.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must obtain explicit consent before using personal data for marketing purposes, setting a clear precedent for email advertising practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The case focused on unauthorized marketing emails and lack of consent, unrelated to cookie or consent banner issues.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 2 C 133/21 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
9 September 2021
Authority
DPA AGPfaffenhofenadIlm
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 2 C 133/21 - Germany (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: