Court case 2 C 133/21 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2021)
A German court ruled that a company promoting FFP2 masks sent a marketing email to a lawyer without consent. The court found this violated GDPR rules because the company didn't have a valid reason to use the lawyer's email for advertising. This case highlights the importance of obtaining clear consent before sending marketing emails.
What happened
A company sent a marketing email about FFP2 masks to a lawyer without obtaining their consent.
Who was affected
The lawyer who received the unsolicited marketing email from the company.
What the authority found
The court decided the company violated GDPR by using the lawyer's email for marketing without a valid legal basis, such as consent.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must obtain explicit consent before using personal data for marketing purposes, setting a clear precedent for email advertising practices.
GDPR Articles Cited
National Law Articles
The case involved unauthorized marketing emails and lack of consent, not related to cookies or consent mechanisms.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 2 C 133/21 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 2 C 133/21 - Germany (2021). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: