1. unknown data subject (co-participant and complainant in the procedure before the DSB) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An Austrian court sent a case back to the data protection authority because the original investigation was too shallow. This highlights the need for thorough investigations when handling privacy complaints.
What happened
The court found that the data protection authority's investigation into a privacy complaint was insufficient and sent the case back for further review.
Who was affected
An individual who claimed their personal information was improperly discussed in confidential calls.
What the authority found
The court decided that the data protection authority's decision lacked depth and required further investigation.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes the importance of detailed investigations in privacy cases, ensuring that authorities thoroughly examine claims before making decisions.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 18 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, date discrepancy.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject alleged a violation of Article 5 GDPR by the complainant and brought his complaint to the Data Protection Authority (Datenschutzbehörde - DSB). They claimed that the president of the complainant had discussed his person in confidential telephone calls with various offices. According to him, the information discussed was suitable to portray him negatively. The complainant argued that the oral discussion at a general meeting was not subject to the material scope of Article 2 GDPR. Furthermore, it argued, that even in case of the application of the GDPR, Article 5 hat not been violated. The DSB decided in favour of the data subject. The court did not decide on the subject matter. Instead, it repealed the contested decision and referred it back to the DSB in accordance with § 28(3) VwGVG. It concluded that the reasoning of the DSB's decision had been too superficial. According to the court, the decision showed a lack of investigation since the DSB had not even presented what type of personal data had been processed.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for 1. unknown data subject (co-participant and complainant in the procedure before the DSB) in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
16 January 2022
Authority
DPA BVwG
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. 1. unknown data subject (co-participant and complainant in the procedure before the DSB) - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: