Police Rotterdam β Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A divorced father won a court case against the Rotterdam police for keeping inaccurate records about him. The court ordered the police to delete a false report of domestic violence and correct another report. This decision emphasizes the right to correct personal data under GDPR.
What happened
The Rotterdam police refused to delete or correct inaccurate personal data about a divorced father, leading to a court ruling.
Who was affected
A divorced father whose personal data was inaccurately recorded by the Rotterdam police.
What the authority found
The court ruled that the Rotterdam police must delete and correct inaccurate personal data, upholding the father's rights under GDPR.
Why this matters
This ruling reinforces individuals' rights to have inaccurate personal data corrected. Organizations must ensure data accuracy and be responsive to correction requests.
GDPR Articles Cited
This dispute was between a divorced father (the data subject) and the chief of police of Rotterdam (the controller). In 2020, the data subject found out that Veilig Thuis (an advice and reporting centre for domestic violence and child abuse) had registered two reports on him in their database. The first registration stated that he had committed domestic violence and that subsequently he was temporarily denied entrance to the home he had previously shared with his ex-wife. According to the data subject, these allegations were unfounded. According to the data subject, the second registration was also inaccurate since the report did not adequately state that his ex-wife had moved to a new place with their son, without informing him of the new location. He requested to have the first report deleted, and the other rectified, but Veilig Thuis refused. The data subject then brought the issue before Court, which decided that Veilig Thuis did not have a substantial interest in retaining the personal data, and that it had to delete the first report and amend the second one. Because Veilig Thuis had received the information from the Rotterdam police, the data subject subsequently requested the police to delete the inaccurate personal data and rectify the reports. The police, however, claimed that the information was accurate, and refused to rectify their files on the data subject. The data subject then brought the issue before the District Court of First Instance of Rotterdam (hereinafter the Court), basing his claim on Article 12 GDPR on transparent information, communication and modalities for the exercise of the rights of the data subject, and his right to obtain from the controller the rectification of inaccurate personal data pursuant to Article 16 GDPR. The Court upheld the claim. Regarding the first registration (on alleged domestic violence), the Court considered that, in 2019, the police had decided not to further investigate the allegations of domestic violence bro
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Police Rotterdam in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Police Rotterdam - Netherlands (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: