Osterreichische Post AG (controller) – Court Ruling (Austria, 2022)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde22 June 2022Austria
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Austrian court found that the Austrian DPA didn't properly investigate a complaint about Osterreichische Post AG's data processing. The court sent the case back to the DPA to verify the facts about when the data was deleted. This matters because it shows that authorities must thoroughly check claims before making decisions.

What happened

The Austrian court ruled that the DPA must independently verify the timeline of data deletion by Osterreichische Post AG.

Who was affected

The person who requested access to their data and claimed it was processed unlawfully by Osterreichische Post AG.

What the authority found

The court decided that the DPA should not have relied solely on the company's statements without conducting its own investigation.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of thorough investigations by data protection authorities. It reminds companies that their claims about data handling may be scrutinized and verified independently.

National Law Articles

§ 24(4) DSG
Decision AuthorityBVwG
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject submitted an access request to the controller, Osterreichische Post AG, and she received a letter in response dated 10.12.18. The data subject submitted a complaint to the Austrian DPA (DSB) on 18.02.20 alleging that the controller had no legal basis under which to process her data and that the response she received to her request was incomplete and thus violated her right to access her personal data. The DPA rejected the data subject's complaint on the grounds that her right to file a complaint had expired per § 24(4) DSG because more than a year had elapsed between the time she discovered the alleged violation and the time she filed her complaint. The data subject appealed on the grounds that the unlawful processing of her data had continued until 13.11.19 when her personal data were deleted by the controller. The controller admitted in a letter to the DPA that the last of its marketing data had been deleted on 13.11.19 but claimed the complainant data subject's personal data had been deleted almost a year earlier on 13.12.18. The Federal Adminstrative Court annulled the contested decision and remanded the matter back to the DPA. Whether the data subject had a right to file a complaint depended entirely on which party's timeline was correct. This was a factual question which was the competence of the DPA, not the Court. The DPA had relied on the controller's submission without verifying it independently, so the Court ordered the DPA to perform its own investigation.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Osterreichische Post AG (controller) in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

22 June 2022

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Osterreichische Post AG (controller) - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: