Municipality of Amersfoort – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2022)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Municipality of Amersfoort refused to share personal data of individuals conducting a séance at a cemetery, citing privacy concerns. This case is significant because it illustrates the balance between privacy rights and the interests of others who may be affected by certain activities.
What happened
The Municipality of Amersfoort declined to disclose personal data of individuals involved in a cemetery séance.
Who was affected
The affected individuals were those conducting the séance, whose personal data was requested by the parents of deceased children.
What the authority found
The court ruled that disclosing the personal data was not justified under GDPR, as it did not align with the original purpose of data processing and lacked a legitimate interest.
Why this matters
This ruling highlights the importance of balancing privacy rights with other interests, such as safety and legal recourse. It serves as a reminder for municipalities and organizations to carefully consider GDPR requirements before disclosing personal data.
GDPR Articles Cited
Data subjects were a group looking for paranormal activities. They visited a cemetery in the municipality of Amersfoort (controller) to conduct a séance, "looking for energies of the deceased". This happened with the permission of the director of the cemetery. The parents of two children who were buried at the cemetery later found out about the séance and requested the data subjects' NAW-data (name, address and residence) from the municipality. They wanted to talk to them directly and possibly hold them liable for the damage they suffered as a result of the séance. The mother stated that it is absolutely not allowed to summon "spirits or devils" at graves in their Islamic culture. As a result of the séance, she claimed to have suffered serious psychological problems. The data subjects did not want their personal data to be disclosed. They had received serious threats because of the incident and felt unsafe. The municipality apologised for the events but stated that it was not obliged to disclose the personal data to the parents. It did offer to facilitate a conversation between the parties, during which the data subjects would remain anonymous, but the parents declined the offer. The parents were of the opinion that the municipality was acting unlawfully by not providing the personal data, so they brought the case before the court. The District Court of Midden-Nederland (Rechtbank Midden-Nederland - Rb. Midden-Nederland) heard the case. The Court stated that the data subject's did not consent to the disclosure of their personal data and this does not fit with the purpose for which the data was initially processed. It must therefore be tested against Article 6(1)(f) and (4) GDPR. The Court noted that (1) there must be legitimate interest, (2) the disclosure must be necessary and (3) it had to balance the interests of both parties: the right to protection of personal data and the safety of the research group and the right to information and effective legal p
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Municipality of Amersfoort in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Municipality of Amersfoort - Netherlands (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: