Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case W252 2239742-1/11Z – Court Ruling (Austria, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA BVwG5 July 2022Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court is currently reviewing a case where a complainant claimed their right to access video recordings of therapy sessions was violated. The court has paused the proceedings pending a ruling from the European Court of Justice. This situation illustrates the complexities of privacy rights in sensitive contexts.

What happened

A complainant's request for access to therapy session recordings was not fulfilled, leading to a legal challenge.

Who was affected

The individual who sought access to their therapy session recordings.

What the authority found

The court has not yet made a decision on the merits of the case and is awaiting guidance from the European Court of Justice.

Why this matters

This case underscores the ongoing legal debates about access to personal data in therapeutic settings. It highlights the need for clear regulations regarding privacy rights in sensitive areas.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 15(3) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 12(1) GDPR
Art. 15(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 15(3) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 17 VwGVG
§ 38 AVG
Art 133 Abs 4 B-VG
Decision AuthorityBVwG

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The complainant saw his right of access violated, since video recordings of therapy sessions had not been sent to him. The DPA dismissed the complaint as unfounded. Consequently, the complainant filed an appeal against this decision. The BVwG did not (yet) take a decision on the merit of the case but stalled the procedure it filed a request for preliminary ruling on the question the interpretation of Article 15(3) GDPR in August 2021. See decision BVwG - W211 2222613-2/12E. Once the CJEU has passed its judgment on the matter, the BVwG will resume the case.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W252 2239742-1/11Z in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

5 July 2022

Authority

DPA BVwG

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W252 2239742-1/11Z - Austria (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: