Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam22 September 2022Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A sports club in the Netherlands shared personal information of its members with sponsors without their consent. The court found that the club did not have a valid legal reason for this action. This case highlights the importance of obtaining consent before sharing personal data.

What happened

The sports club provided personal information of its members to sponsors without their consent.

Who was affected

Members of the sports club whose personal information was shared with sponsors.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the sports club lacked a valid legal basis for processing personal data, violating GDPR's requirements.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes that organizations must have valid legal grounds for sharing personal data. It serves as a reminder for clubs and organizations to ensure they have proper consent mechanisms in place.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam

Source checks

Secondary-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: amount discrepancy, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller is a sports club in the legal form of an association. To, in its own words, 'give more meaning' to the sport, its vision and the memberships of its members, the controller worked with sponsors. It provided these sponsors with personal information of its members (the data subjects) such as names and addresses. Some members complained to the Dutch DPA that they did not give the controller explicit consent to provide its sponsors with their personal data. The Dutch DPA investigated the matter and found that the controller had disclosed the personal data without consent or any other legal ground, in breach of Article 5(1)(b) and Article 6(1) read in conjunction with Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. The DPA fined the controller €525,000. The controller appealed the DPA's decision at the District Court of Amsterdam. It stated that there was, in fact, a legal ground for processing and this was its legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The DPA continued to be of the opinion that the controller had no legitimate interest and that the processing was not necessary to pursue such alleged legitimate interest. The parties were divided on the interpretation and scope of legitimate interest within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. According to the DPA, it followed from the grammatical interpretation of this term that there must be an interest laid down in a law. According to the controller, any interest was justified unless prohibited by law. The Court noted that there were three cumulative conditions according to established case law of the CJEU for processing on the grounds of legitimate interest: (1) the pursuit of a legitimate interest of the controller, (2) the processing must be necessary and (3) the controller's legitimate interest must outweigh the interest or fundamental fights and freedoms of the data subject(s). The Court held that it could not without reasonable doubt decide whether the controller had a legitimate interest. There was no established

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

22 September 2022

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) - Netherlands (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: