Court case 4 BV 21.2328 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2022)

Court Ruling
DPA VGHMnchen27 September 2022Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled that a property owner could object to the installation of a radio-enabled water meter. The court found that the water meter could collect personal data, which the owner had the right to refuse. This case is significant because it shows how personal data concerns can affect even utility installations.

What happened

A property owner objected to the installation of a radio-enabled water meter, claiming it collected personal data.

Who was affected

The property owner and their employees using the building as an architectural office.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the owner had a valid right to object to the water meter installation due to personal data concerns.

Why this matters

This decision highlights that even utility companies must consider privacy rights when installing technology that can collect data. Businesses should be aware of how their operations might impact data privacy.

GDPR Articles Cited

National Law Articles

Article 13(1) of the Basic Law
Article 24(4) sentence 5 of the Rules of Procedure
Decision AuthorityVGH München (Germany)
Reviewed AuthorityVGH München (Germany)
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff was the owner of a plot of land in the association area of the defendant, which operated a public water supply facility for the area. The building located on this property was used by the plaintiff and their employees exclusively as an architectural office. After the defendant had announced that the existing water meters would be replaced and converted to electronic water meters with the option of radio reading, the plaintiff objected by letter. The defendant rejected this objection and argued that the right of objection pursuant to [https://www.gesetze-bayern.de/Content/Document/BayGO-24 Article 24(4) sentence 5 of the Bavarian Law on Municipalities] did not apply to the plaintiff's property because a commercial enterprise was located there. Therefore, no personal data could be read out. Eventually, the water meter was installed using coercive measures and the plaintiff initiated court proceedings. In its judgement of 29 July 2021, the Administrative Court of Munich ordered the defendant, upon complaint by the plaintiff, to switch off the radio module of the electronic water meter in the plaintiff's property. The court ruled that the right to object was exercised properly and should have been granted. However, the defendant appealed this position by referring to of [https://dejure.org/gesetze/GG/13.html Article 13(1) of the German Basic Law] on protection of personal data. Accordingly, the right to object only existed if the data concerned the occupants of houses. In the case of rooms used for commercial or professional purposes, it was not possible to draw conclusions about personal data because of the associated contacts with business partners and visits by customers. The court in appeal had to consider, among others, whether information from the electronic water meter could be considered as personal data pursuant to Article 4(1) GDPR. The court first noted that the the primary reason for the right to object to the installation of a water mete

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 4 BV 21.2328 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

27 September 2022

Authority

DPA VGHMnchen

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 4 BV 21.2328 - Germany (2022). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: