Enforcing jurisdiction
Norway · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Østre Toten municipality – Court Ruling (Norway, 2023)

Court Ruling
Datatilsynet (Norway)24 January 2023Norway
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Østre Toten municipality appealed a fine related to a ransomware attack that resulted in the loss of sensitive personal data. The Privacy Appeals Board upheld the DPA's findings of security shortcomings but disagreed on the responsibility for the breaches. This case illustrates the complexities of accountability in data protection.

What happened

The municipality faced a fine after a ransomware attack led to the loss of sensitive personal data.

Who was affected

Residents of Østre Toten whose sensitive personal data was lost and sold on the dark web.

What the authority found

The Privacy Appeals Board agreed with the DPA on security deficiencies but disagreed on the assignment of responsibility for the breaches.

Why this matters

This case highlights the ongoing challenges municipalities face in ensuring data security and the importance of clear accountability structures in data protection.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 24 GDPR
Art. 32 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 83 GDPR
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(i) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 24(GDPR)
Art. 32(GDPR)
Art. 58(2)(d) GDPR
Art. 58(2)(i) GDPR
Art. 83(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
Personal Data Act § 26(1)
Decision AuthorityPersonvernnemnda (Norway)
Reviewed AuthorityDatatilsynet (Norway)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: amount discrepancy, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

This case is an appeal of a decision in which the DPA fined a municipality (the controller) about €352,555 (NOK 4,000,000) for violating Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 24 GDPR and Article 32 GDPR after a serious ransomware attack led to highly sensitive personal data being irreparably lost and sold on the dark web. The controller disagreed with the DPA on the part of the decision pertaining to the fine and asked them to reconsider their position. After the DPA had reviewed the case again, they found no grounds to change their decision and so, as per Norwegian procedures, referred the case to the Privacy Appeals Board. In their comments to the Privacy Appeals Board, the controller argued that the grounds for an administrative fine were non-existent. They also held that they had implemented sufficient technical and organisational measures available to them as per their internal resources and in line with Article 24 GDPR and Article 32 GDPR. The Privacy Appeals Board reviewed the case, both parties' arguments, grounds for imposing an administrative fine as per the GDPR, as well as the objective and subjective grounds for assessing if personal data breaches took place. After assessing the controller's personal data practices, the Privacy Appeals Board held that they agreed with the DPA in that the various deficiencies represented fundamental shortcomings in the controller's information security, resulting in violations of Article 24 GDPR and Article 32 GDPR. When assessing the subjective grounds, however, the Privacy Appeals Board noted that the DPA had taken an incorrect legal standpoint and interpreted the legality inaccurately. They disagreed with the DPA's interpretation that the Chief Municipal Executive was objectively responsible for the personal data breaches, regardless of him acting negligent. In the Privacy Appeals Board's view, the insufficient IT security must be sees against a lack of focus over time, long before the Chief Municipal Executive was employed

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Details

Ruling Date

24 January 2023

Authority

Datatilsynet (Norway)

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Østre Toten municipality - Norway (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: