Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

Court case 4 O 13063/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA LGMnchen30 March 2023Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled that a company did not owe damages for transferring personal data to Google when users did not directly visit its website. The court stated that individuals who did not manually visit the site could not claim harm. This case is significant as it addresses the use of automated systems in data protection claims.

What happened

The court dismissed a claim for damages related to data transfers to Google Fonts.

Who was affected

Individuals represented by a data protection association who claimed their data was improperly transferred.

What the authority found

The court found no legal basis for claims of damages under GDPR since the individuals did not directly visit the website.

Why this matters

This decision highlights the complexities of data protection claims and the limitations of automated data collection methods.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 82 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 82(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityLG München

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The controller embedded Google Fonts on its website. When a user visited the website, their personal data were transferred to Google Inc. in the US. Considering that the controller violated Chapter V of the GDPR, a data protection association deployed an automated system – a so-called “web crawler” – to detect data transfers through Google Fonts tools. Then, the association representing the data subjects contacted the controller and asked for non-material damages under Article 82 GDPR. Meanwhile, the controller had updated its website and removed the Google Fonts. The controller argued that the claim for damages was part of a broader initiative affecting hundreds of thousands of controllers in Germany. The controller stressed that the individual data subjects represented by the data protection association never manually and directly visited its website. Thus, the controller brought action against the association and asked the Regional Court of Munich (LG Münich) to declare the association’s claims unlawful. The German Court upheld the controller’s arguments. The court did not consider whether the controller violated the GDPR by undertaking data transfers to the US, nor whether the data subjects implicitly consented to such transfers by accepting to visit the websites. Instead, the court focused on the fact that a person that did not directly and manually visited a website could not feel any annoyance or uncertainty with regard to the transfer of their personal data to a third country. From this perspective, the use of web crawlers played a major role in ruling out an actual infringement of data subjects’ rights. The court also stated that, even imaging that the use of web crawlers was compatible with a violation of the data subject’s informational self-determination, the data subject provoked the situation against which they complained. In light of the above, the Court adopted a decision declaring the lack of legal basis for any claim for damages under Article 82 GDPR.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 4 O 13063/22 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

30 March 2023

Authority

DPA LGMnchen

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 4 O 13063/22 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: