Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case 8 U 94/22 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA LGDortmund26 April 2023Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that a member of an association could obtain the contact information of other members to organize opposition against the board. The court found that the member had a legitimate interest in contacting others for this purpose. This case shows that individuals can have rights to access information for legitimate organizational purposes.

What happened

A member requested a list of names and contact details of other members from an association.

Who was affected

The member of the association who sought to contact others for organizing opposition to the board's actions.

What the authority found

The court upheld the member's right to access the information based on their legitimate interest.

Why this matters

This case illustrates that members of organizations can assert their rights to access information for legitimate purposes, which could encourage more transparency and participation in associations.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(b) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 38 BGB
§ 7(2) UWG
Decision AuthorityOLG Hamm
Reviewed AuthorityLG Dortmund

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 18 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The plaintiff was a member of the defendant, a registered association with approximately 5,500 members, and requested that the association transferred a list containing the names, addresses and e-mail addresses of the association's members directly to them, i.e. without the involvement of a trustee. These data were necessary in preparation for the association's general meeting. The plaintiff's concern was to contact other members to organize opposition to the actions of the association's board. Following the general meeting, the plaintiff also intended to contact members in the same manner in order to initiate the calling of an extraordinary general meeting, pursuant to § 37(1) of the German Civil Code. After the Dortmund Regional Court denied the plaintiff's claim to transmission of the list of members, the plaintiff appealed to the Hamm Higher Regional Court (OLG Hamm). The court sustained the appeal. Interestingly, the court examined the dispute first from an association law perspective and then from a data protection perspective. National law (association law) First, the court stated that a claim requires a legitimate interest of the association member, which must not be outweighed by any secrecy interests of the association or legitimate interests of the association members in the context of a comprehensive weighing of interests in the individual case. The basic interest involved in this case, the organization of an opposition to the policy of the defendant's association board, must be considered as legitimate. This interest requires to get in contact with the other members also outside of the meeting of the members, for example in order to motivate these to participate in those meetings in the first place. In particular, the plaintiff had a legitimate interest in obtaining the e-mail addresses, since e-mail communication enables an almost free, direct, individualized exchange practically without time delay, but at the same time also asynchronous communicati

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 8 U 94/22 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

26 April 2023

Authority

DPA LGDortmund

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 8 U 94/22 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: