Court case 15 U 108/23 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2023)

Court Ruling
DPA OLGKln7 December 2023Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The Higher Regional Court of Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln, OLG Köln) decided on appeal on case 28 O 138/22 by the Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln, LG Köln). In the appealed judgment, the LG Köln ruled that, in order for a claim for damages under Article 82 GDPR to arise, the mere annoyance and suffering of emotional discomfort do not suffice. The data subject in that case, was a Facebook user whose personal data were disclosed as a consequence of a major data breach in 2019. The data subject appealed the decision by the LG Köln, restating his initial arguments and seeking again damages for loss of control over his personal data and emotional discomfort as a consequence thereof. On 07 December 2023 the OLG Köln pronounced its judgment. The OLG declared the appeal admissible. The court ascertained that there had indeed been several GDPR violations by the controller, and went on to assess whether they could give rise to the award of immaterial damages under Article 82 GDPR also in light of [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-300/21_-_%C3%96sterreichische_Post_AG CJEU in C-300/21.] The court held that even if the plaintiff did lose control over his data as they had been published in the darknet, in connection with his name and against his will, this, in turn, does not suffice to constitute an immaterial damage. Citing [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-300/21_-_%C3%96sterreichische_Post_AG CJEU C-300/21], the OLG ruled that the fact that there is no threshold that defines the existence of a damage, still does not mean that the person affected by a GDPR infringement is exempted from proving the negative consequences of the damage. In the present case, the OLG held that the plaintiff only proved the “negative consequence” suffered but not the immaterial damage itself. Hence, the plaintiff failed to prove that the loss of control over his personal data constitutes an immaterial damage and thus remains a merely abstract loss of control.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 82 GDPR
Decision AuthorityOLG Köln
Full Legal Summary

The Higher Regional Court of Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln, OLG Köln) decided on appeal on case 28 O 138/22 by the Regional Court of Cologne (Landgericht Köln, LG Köln). In the appealed judgment, the LG Köln ruled that, in order for a claim for damages under Article 82 GDPR to arise, the mere annoyance and suffering of emotional discomfort do not suffice. The data subject in that case, was a Facebook user whose personal data were disclosed as a consequence of a major data breach in 2019. The data subject appealed the decision by the LG Köln, restating his initial arguments and seeking again damages for loss of control over his personal data and emotional discomfort as a consequence thereof. On 07 December 2023 the OLG Köln pronounced its judgment. The OLG declared the appeal admissible. The court ascertained that there had indeed been several GDPR violations by the controller, and went on to assess whether they could give rise to the award of immaterial damages under Article 82 GDPR also in light of [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-300/21_-_%C3%96sterreichische_Post_AG CJEU in C-300/21.] The court held that even if the plaintiff did lose control over his data as they had been published in the darknet, in connection with his name and against his will, this, in turn, does not suffice to constitute an immaterial damage. Citing [https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=CJEU_-_C-300/21_-_%C3%96sterreichische_Post_AG CJEU C-300/21], the OLG ruled that the fact that there is no threshold that defines the existence of a damage, still does not mean that the person affected by a GDPR infringement is exempted from proving the negative consequences of the damage. In the present case, the OLG held that the plaintiff only proved the “negative consequence” suffered but not the immaterial damage itself. Hence, the plaintiff failed to prove that the loss of control over his personal data constitutes an immaterial damage and thus remains a merely abstract loss of control.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 15 U 108/23 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

7 December 2023

Authority

DPA OLGKln

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 15 U 108/23 - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: