Court case 24 O 1624/23 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA LGMemmingen13 June 2024Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The data subject signed a contract with the controller for telecommunications services. On 26 June 2023, the data subject received information about a data transmission. The data subject objected to the disclosure by the controller of his personal data included in a contract to a legal entity other than the parties to the contract. The controller registered contract data to a legal entity other than the parties to the contract, supporting a joint fraud control system for the credit industry. The controller shared the personal data (name, address, date of birth, dates of the start and end of a telecommunications contract, contract number and reporting feature) without explicit consent of the data subject. The data subject initiated legal proceedings and was seeking damages, in the form of non-material compensation, for a data transmission without consent. The Regional Court Memmingen dismissed the case on the grounds that the data subject had failed to prove the existence of any present or future damage that was reasonably likely to occur. The prevention of fraud may constitute a legitimate interest of the controller within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
Decision AuthorityLG Memmingen
Full Legal Summary

The data subject signed a contract with the controller for telecommunications services. On 26 June 2023, the data subject received information about a data transmission. The data subject objected to the disclosure by the controller of his personal data included in a contract to a legal entity other than the parties to the contract. The controller registered contract data to a legal entity other than the parties to the contract, supporting a joint fraud control system for the credit industry. The controller shared the personal data (name, address, date of birth, dates of the start and end of a telecommunications contract, contract number and reporting feature) without explicit consent of the data subject. The data subject initiated legal proceedings and was seeking damages, in the form of non-material compensation, for a data transmission without consent. The Regional Court Memmingen dismissed the case on the grounds that the data subject had failed to prove the existence of any present or future damage that was reasonably likely to occur. The prevention of fraud may constitute a legitimate interest of the controller within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Violations (1)

Cookies Placed Before Consent
critical

Non-essential cookies (tracking, advertising) are placed on the user's device before obtaining valid consent.

Art. 6(1) GDPR

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 24 O 1624/23 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 June 2024

Authority

DPA LGMemmingen

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 24 O 1624/23 - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: