Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case 24 O 1624/23 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA LGMemmingen13 June 2024Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled that a telecommunications provider shared a customer's personal data without consent. The court dismissed the customer's claim for damages, stating there was no proof of harm. This case underscores the need for companies to obtain consent before sharing personal information.

What happened

The telecommunications provider disclosed a customer's contract data to a third party without consent.

Who was affected

The customer whose personal data was shared without permission.

What the authority found

The court found that the customer did not demonstrate any actual or potential harm from the data sharing.

Why this matters

This case highlights the importance of obtaining consent for data sharing. Companies must ensure they have a valid legal basis before disclosing personal information to third parties.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityLG Memmingen

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 22 March 2026.

Processing notes: national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The data subject signed a contract with the controller for telecommunications services. On 26 June 2023, the data subject received information about a data transmission. The data subject objected to the disclosure by the controller of his personal data included in a contract to a legal entity other than the parties to the contract. The controller registered contract data to a legal entity other than the parties to the contract, supporting a joint fraud control system for the credit industry. The controller shared the personal data (name, address, date of birth, dates of the start and end of a telecommunications contract, contract number and reporting feature) without explicit consent of the data subject. The data subject initiated legal proceedings and was seeking damages, in the form of non-material compensation, for a data transmission without consent. The Regional Court Memmingen dismissed the case on the grounds that the data subject had failed to prove the existence of any present or future damage that was reasonably likely to occur. The prevention of fraud may constitute a legitimate interest of the controller within the meaning of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 24 O 1624/23 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 June 2024

Authority

DPA LGMemmingen

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 24 O 1624/23 - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: