Enforcing jurisdiction
Netherlands · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation
Privacy topics

STAAT DER NEDERLANDEN (Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport), – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA RbAmsterdam17 July 2024Netherlands
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court ruled that the State of the Netherlands failed to protect personal data during the COVID-19 pandemic. This matters because it shows that public health organizations must prioritize data security, especially when handling sensitive information. The court's findings emphasize the need for better data protection measures.

What happened

The State of the Netherlands did not take adequate steps to secure personal data in its GGD systems during the pandemic.

Who was affected

Individuals whose personal data was processed by the GGD systems during the COVID-19 pandemic.

What the authority found

The court found that the State violated GDPR by not implementing necessary technical and organizational measures to protect personal data.

Why this matters

This ruling highlights the importance of data security in public health responses. Organizations must ensure they have robust data protection strategies in place to safeguard personal information.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 25 GDPR
Art. 32 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
Art. 80 GDPR
Art. 82(1) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 25(GDPR)
Art. 32(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 80(GDPR)
Art. 82(1) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
3:305a BW
6:162 BW
Wet afwikkeling massaschade in collectieve actie
Decision AuthorityRb. Amsterdam

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 22 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

Before the COVID-19 pandemic: The State and others were already aware that the IT systems of the GGD were outdated and would not be suitable for handling a large epidemic or pandemic. Nevertheless, no adequate measures were taken to improve the systems. March 2020: The GGD systems, HPZone, and later CoronIT, are used to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. April 2020: The European Data Protection Board (EDPB) emphasizes the importance of data protection in combating the coronavirus. January 22, 2021: GGD GHOR Nederland reports a data breach to the Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP). This is referred to in the media as the "corona data leak." January 28, 2021: GGD GHOR publishes a page with "Frequently Asked Questions and Answers about Data Theft" on their website. At this time, there is still much uncertainty about the extent of the data leak. February 2021: Following media reports about the theft and trade of personal data from GGD systems, the AP announces that it will intensify its supervision of the GGD. KPMG advises GGD GHOR to stop using HPZone as soon as possible due to inadequate data protection. The AP investigates the security of websites linked to DigiD, including www.coronatest.nl. April 2021 to January 2022: The AP investigates whether GGD GHOR and two local GGDs have taken appropriate technical and organizational measures to protect personal data in the context of testing, vaccinating, and contact tracing. The AP acknowledges that the GGDs faced a huge challenge due to the pandemic, but emphasizes that good data security is essential, especially given the large amount of sensitive data the GGD processes. The AP shares its findings with GGD GHOR and gives them until March 1, 2022, to implement improvements. November 25, 2021: Stichting ICAM is founded with the aim of taking action against (threatened) privacy violations of citizens, including claiming compensation after data breaches. April 25, 2022: GGD GHOR sends letters to 1,2

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for STAAT DER NEDERLANDEN (Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport), in NL

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

17 July 2024

Authority

DPA RbAmsterdam

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. STAAT DER NEDERLANDEN (Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport), - Netherlands (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: