Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation – Court Ruling (Norway, 2024)

Court Ruling
Datatilsynet (Norway)24 September 2024Norway
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A data subject requested access to her data processed by the board within the [https://www.npe.no/no/ Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation] (Norsk pasienterstatning), a controller. The data subject was a party to proceedings before the controller and her request covered the documents of the case, including the logs data. The data subject stood on the position that the controller’s employees didn’t check the documents in depth, while examining her case. For this reason, the data subject wanted to verify who and when accessed her documents. The controller partially answered the access request. The data subject didn’t receive the information she asked for, in particular whether printouts of the documents were done, or the documents were sent by e-mail or copied and stored elsewhere. The data subject complained with the Norwegian DPA (Datatilsynet) and notified the Ministry of Public health. The data subject claimed that the controller violated Article 32 GDPR, because they didn’t secure the data properly as there was no logs control in place. Moreover, lack of access to log data deprived the data subject from scrutinising the controller’s conduct with their case. Additionally, the data subject filed an access request with the [https://www.helseklage.no National Appeals Body for the Health Service] (Nasjonalt klageorgan for helsetjenesten), which was the body competent to deal with appeals and/or complaints against the controller's decisions. The appeal body answered the request and provided the data subject with the dates and purposes of access to the data subject’s documents. Nevertheless, in reference to the Ministry of Public health letter, the appeal body didn’t disclosed the identity of employees who accessed the documents. The DPA issued a decision, stating that access request was answered. Moreover, alleged violation of Article 32 GDPR were not found. Thus, the DPA closed the case. The data subject lodged an appeal with the Privacy Appeals Boa

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 32 GDPR
Art. 57(1)(f) GDPR
Decision AuthorityPVN (Norway)
Reviewed AuthorityDatatilsynet (Norway)
Full Legal Summary

A data subject requested access to her data processed by the board within the [https://www.npe.no/no/ Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation] (Norsk pasienterstatning), a controller. The data subject was a party to proceedings before the controller and her request covered the documents of the case, including the logs data. The data subject stood on the position that the controller’s employees didn’t check the documents in depth, while examining her case. For this reason, the data subject wanted to verify who and when accessed her documents. The controller partially answered the access request. The data subject didn’t receive the information she asked for, in particular whether printouts of the documents were done, or the documents were sent by e-mail or copied and stored elsewhere. The data subject complained with the Norwegian DPA (Datatilsynet) and notified the Ministry of Public health. The data subject claimed that the controller violated Article 32 GDPR, because they didn’t secure the data properly as there was no logs control in place. Moreover, lack of access to log data deprived the data subject from scrutinising the controller’s conduct with their case. Additionally, the data subject filed an access request with the [https://www.helseklage.no National Appeals Body for the Health Service] (Nasjonalt klageorgan for helsetjenesten), which was the body competent to deal with appeals and/or complaints against the controller's decisions. The appeal body answered the request and provided the data subject with the dates and purposes of access to the data subject’s documents. Nevertheless, in reference to the Ministry of Public health letter, the appeal body didn’t disclosed the identity of employees who accessed the documents. The DPA issued a decision, stating that access request was answered. Moreover, alleged violation of Article 32 GDPR were not found. Thus, the DPA closed the case. The data subject lodged an appeal with the Privacy Appeals Boa

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation in NO

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

24 September 2024

Authority

Datatilsynet (Norway)

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Norwegian System of Patient Injury Compensation - Norway (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: