Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case W258 2227269-1/39E – Court Ruling (Austria, 2024)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde27 December 2024Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

An Austrian court ruled against the postal service for unlawfully processing sensitive data related to political affinities. This case highlights the need for companies to handle sensitive information with care and transparency.

What happened

The postal service sold personal data, including political affinities, without proper consent.

Who was affected

Individuals whose personal data, including political affinities, was sold by the postal service.

What the authority found

The court found that the postal service violated GDPR by processing sensitive data without appropriate legal grounds.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the importance of protecting sensitive data and ensuring that individuals are informed about how their data is used, particularly in marketing contexts.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 35 GDPR
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(4) GDPR
Art. 30(1)(c) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(4) GDPR
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 35(GDPR)
Art. 30(1)(c) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityBVwG
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 19 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, amount discrepancy.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On the 8 January 2019, the Austrian DPA (Datenschutzbehörde – DSB) launched an investigation into the actions of the Austrian postal service as it also had a business license for address publishing and direct marketing. Media reports had claimed that the postal service (the controller) sold data concerning the political affinities of data subjects to third parties. The controller ran a platform entitled “Adress Shop” on which it sold personal data to legal entities. The datasets included names and addresses but more importantly it included data subjects’ affinities to certain things such as an affinity to moving house, an affinity to organic products or how frequently a data subject receives packages. The purpose of the data processing was to sell this data to third parties who would use it for marketing purposes and therefore could avoid scattering losses. In order to create this database, the controller abused its position as postal service provider. In the postal service contract provided to data subjects the controller had included a notice stating that data subject are agreeing to their personal data being processed for marketing purposes. The contract however also included a box which could be ticked in order to refuse the data processing for marketing purposes. One of these affinities was concluded through an affinity score concerning the main political parties in Austria. For example, data subjects would be assessed with either a “very low”, “low”, “high” or “very high” affinity towards the SPÖ (the Socialist Party of Austria), the ÖVP (the Conservative Party of Austria) or any other major political party. The controller calculated this score through combing anonymous survey results, socio-demographic data (e.g., age or level of income and education) and voting results of particular region. On the 20 Febuary 2019, the DSB alleged that the controller had unlawfully processed sensitive data under Article 9 GDPR. The DSB found that the controller could no

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case W258 2227269-1/39E in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

27 December 2024

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case W258 2227269-1/39E - Austria (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: