- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 2 R 192/24h – Court Ruling (Austria, 2024)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
An online casino-game provider was ordered to reimburse a user for legal costs after it initially refused to provide access to their personal data. The user had requested information about their account, including deposits and losses. This case highlights the importance of companies responding properly to data access requests.
What happened
The court ruled that the online casino-game provider must reimburse the user for legal costs incurred during a dispute over access to personal data.
Who was affected
The user of the online casino who requested access to their personal data and incurred legal costs.
What the authority found
The court decided that the casino could not claim the user was responsible for the legal costs, as it had initially refused to provide the requested information.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must comply with data access requests and cannot avoid costs by denying valid requests. It serves as a reminder for businesses to handle such requests properly to avoid legal disputes.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Review needed — 22 March 2026.
Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected, date discrepancy.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data controller is an online casino-game provider. The data subject set up an account, deposited money and lost it on the website. On 23rd May 2024, the data subject submitted (through his representative) an access request with the controller requesting access to their personal data, and specifically, all deposits and withdrawals and the stakes, wins and losses made on his account. The access request was made through the data subject’s representative, and included an electronically signed power of attorney and a copy of the data subject’s ID. On 26th May 2024, the controller refused the applicant’s request, asking for a handwritten power of attorney signed by the plaintiff in ink. The data subject did not respond to the controller’s response and filed the present action on 5th July 2024 with the Regional Court of Klagenfurt. The data subject sought that the controller be compelled to provide a digital copy of the data requested. On August 1st 2024, the controller sent further communication to the data subject’s representative and, in light of having received notice of the claim filed, deemed there to be a legally valid power of attorney within the meaning of Section 8 RAO and provided the information requested by the data subject on 23rd May. On 9th October, the data subject, having received the requested information, limited the scope of their filing to request only reimbursement of the costs incurred in the court proceeding. The trial court ruled that the controller could not rely on § 45 ZPO, an Austrian Civil Procedure provision which requires plaintiffs in a proceeding to bear the costs of such proceeding where the cause of action is not attributable to the action of the defendant and the defendant immediately acknowledges the claim in action. The controller had argued that this provision should apply as the power of attorney received in May 2024 was invalid. The trial judge ordered the controller to reimburse the data subject for their legal costs, to the
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 2 R 192/24h in AT
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
9 December 2024
Authority
DPA LGKlagenfurt
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 2 R 192/24h - Austria (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: