Court case 6 U 127/24 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2024)

Court Ruling
DPA LGWiesbaden31 October 2024Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The controller is a credit rating agency. Its contractual partners provide it with information relevant to the database from their business relationships with their customers. The controller stores this information as entries in its database in order to be able to provide its contractual partners with information. The data subject had previously initiated court procedures against the controller about the legality of the so-called score value, which the controller determines on the basis of the data available to it and which is intended to assess the creditworthiness of the person concerned. With regard to this procedure, the controller imposed a so-called score block until its conclusion, with the consequence that no more credit score values are transmitted in the event of a corresponding query by the controller's contractual partners. This can lead to difficulties for the data subject, e.g. for entering into new contracts. The data subject challenged the block imposed by the controller on the data subject of the database for the provision of information on contractual partners with the application to lift the so-called "score block" and to refrain from a future block until the decision in the main action. The Court of first instance dismissed the application for a preliminary injunction. The data subject's appealed this, seeking the court, to order the controller to immediately to lift the block imposed on the applicant of the database for the provision of information on contractual partners, the so-called "score block". The court stated, the data subject is only entitled to the rights of data subjects under Chapter III of the GDPR. The court found, that the data subject seeks the (re)commencement of the processing of personal data by the controller in the form of scoring and the transmission of the scoring value to third parties which is not listed in Chapter III. Thus, the court found, that the GDPR did not provide a legal basis for it's claim. The cour

GDPR Articles Cited

Decision AuthorityOLG Frankfurt am Main
Reviewed AuthorityLG Wiesbaden (Germany)
Full Legal Summary

The controller is a credit rating agency. Its contractual partners provide it with information relevant to the database from their business relationships with their customers. The controller stores this information as entries in its database in order to be able to provide its contractual partners with information. The data subject had previously initiated court procedures against the controller about the legality of the so-called score value, which the controller determines on the basis of the data available to it and which is intended to assess the creditworthiness of the person concerned. With regard to this procedure, the controller imposed a so-called score block until its conclusion, with the consequence that no more credit score values are transmitted in the event of a corresponding query by the controller's contractual partners. This can lead to difficulties for the data subject, e.g. for entering into new contracts. The data subject challenged the block imposed by the controller on the data subject of the database for the provision of information on contractual partners with the application to lift the so-called "score block" and to refrain from a future block until the decision in the main action. The Court of first instance dismissed the application for a preliminary injunction. The data subject's appealed this, seeking the court, to order the controller to immediately to lift the block imposed on the applicant of the database for the provision of information on contractual partners, the so-called "score block". The court stated, the data subject is only entitled to the rights of data subjects under Chapter III of the GDPR. The court found, that the data subject seeks the (re)commencement of the processing of personal data by the controller in the form of scoring and the transmission of the scoring value to third parties which is not listed in Chapter III. Thus, the court found, that the GDPR did not provide a legal basis for it's claim. The cour

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 6 U 127/24 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

31 October 2024

Authority

DPA LGWiesbaden

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 6 U 127/24 - Germany (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: