Enforcing jurisdiction
Croatia · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case Us I-2208/2024-6 – Court Ruling (Croatia, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA USZagreb18 April 2025Croatia
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Croatia reviewed a decision where a kebab shop was fined for inadequate signage about its CCTV usage. This ruling is significant as it highlights the need for clear communication about surveillance practices.

What happened

The Administrative Court of Zagreb examined a fine imposed on a kebab shop for insufficient signage regarding its CCTV cameras.

Who was affected

Customers and visitors to the kebab shop were affected by the lack of proper signage about CCTV usage.

What the authority found

The court found inconsistencies in the DPA's decision and noted that the shop's signage did not adequately inform visitors about the CCTV.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the importance of clear signage for businesses using surveillance cameras, reminding operators to ensure visitors are informed about such practices.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 13 GDPR
Art. 58(2)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 13(GDPR)
Art. 58(2)(a) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

Decision AuthorityUS Zagreb

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Review needed — 21 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, amount discrepancy, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A controller brought an action before the Administrative Court of Zagreb seeking annulment of a decision made by the Agencija za zaštitu osobnih podataka (Croatian DPA) where they were fined €2,500. The contested decision had found that controller had infringed Article 13 GDPR by using CCTV in and outside of their premises, a kebab shop, with signage only being visible upon entering the store. It was also found that an outdoor terrace had no signage at all. The controller argued that the fine amount was excessive and requests annulment of the decision and its adoption without the fine. The controller further agued that in relation to the outdoor terrace, this area is only accessible through the shopping centre where there are existing signs highlighting that CCTV is in operation. The controller contended that a warning under Article 58(2)(1) GDPR in lieu of a fine would have been more appropriate in the circumstance. The DPA argued that the decision was taking lawfully and based on a correct application of the law. The DPA noted that the small notices were not visible to data subjects before entering the recording perimeter and the notice published on the controller’s website was insufficient and did not include the contact details of the controller. The DPA further submitted that they were obliged to impose and administrative fine in the circumstances as a more lenient sanction in this case was not provided for under the law. The Court firstly highlighted an inconsistency in the contested decision. The DPA had at one point highlighted the existence of CCTV in the outdoor terrace, but further on in the decision, failed to include this area in the list of areas covered by CCTV. The Court further noted that although the decision found an infringement of Article 13 GDPR on the part of the controller, there were no reasons for this provided in the decision. The Court was further critical of the lack of clarity in the DPA’s decision as to the existence or the absence o

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case Us I-2208/2024-6 in HR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

18 April 2025

Authority

DPA USZagreb

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case Us I-2208/2024-6 - Croatia (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: