Google Ireland Ltd – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A German court ruled that Google Ireland Ltd's account sign-up process did not provide clear consent options for users. This matters because it shows that companies must make consent processes easy to understand and truly voluntary. Website operators should ensure their consent mechanisms are transparent.
What happened
The court found that Google Ireland Ltd's sign-up process for Google accounts lacked clear and voluntary consent options for users.
Who was affected
Users who signed up for Google accounts and were subjected to confusing consent options.
What the authority found
The court decided that Google did not provide a transparent and informed consent process, violating GDPR requirements.
Why this matters
This ruling sets a precedent for how consent must be obtained in digital services. Companies should evaluate their consent processes to ensure they are clear and compliant.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
The plaintiff is a nationwide umbrella organisation of consumer centres in Germany. It is a qualified organisation to bring collective redress actions according to german law. The contoller is Google Ireland Ltd, the provider of Google services in the EEA. To use some of the services provided by the defendant, a ‘Google account’ is required. At the sign up process, after users have first entered personal data to create an account, they must choose between 2 "personalisation settings”, “express personalisation" or "manual personalisation". “Express personalisation" consists of a 1 step page that permits personalised advertising while the "manual personalisation" consist of 5 steps that allow the user to select the personal data they want to share. When users log in to their Google account, after completing the registration process, they have the possibility to modify the duration of data storage and reduce it to 3 months. In June 2022 the plaintiff sent the controller an unsuccessful warning letter, arguing that with this sign up process for a Google account, the controller violated Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR since there is a lack of a voluntary, transparent and informed consent for a specific purpose. More specifically; a. The user does not have the option to refuse giving consent in the case of "express personalisation" and that the user is also unaware that they have the option of not giving consent if they return to "manual personalisation". b. In the context of "manual personalisation", the use of personal data in the "personalised advertising" area cannot be completely deselected, as the controller processes the user's "general location" for advertising purposes. c. There is no transparent list of the defendant's services for which consent is given and therefore lack of a specific purpose. d. The design of the consent process is confusing and unclear, in particular the use of "personalisation" instead of "consent" to the use of data. The co
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Google Ireland Ltd in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google Ireland Ltd - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: