Google Ireland Ltd – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA LGBerlin25 March 2025Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

The plaintiff is a nationwide umbrella organisation of consumer centres in Germany. It is a qualified organisation to bring collective redress actions according to german law. The contoller is Google Ireland Ltd, the provider of Google services in the EEA. To use some of the services provided by the defendant, a ‘Google account’ is required. At the sign up process, after users have first entered personal data to create an account, they must choose between 2 "personalisation settings”, “express personalisation" or "manual personalisation". “Express personalisation" consists of a 1 step page that permits personalised advertising while the "manual personalisation" consist of 5 steps that allow the user to select the personal data they want to share. When users log in to their Google account, after completing the registration process, they have the possibility to modify the duration of data storage and reduce it to 3 months. In June 2022 the plaintiff sent the controller an unsuccessful warning letter, arguing that with this sign up process for a Google account, the controller violated Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR since there is a lack of a voluntary, transparent and informed consent for a specific purpose. More specifically; a. The user does not have the option to refuse giving consent in the case of "express personalisation" and that the user is also unaware that they have the option of not giving consent if they return to "manual personalisation". b. In the context of "manual personalisation", the use of personal data in the "personalised advertising" area cannot be completely deselected, as the controller processes the user's "general location" for advertising purposes. c. There is no transparent list of the defendant's services for which consent is given and therefore lack of a specific purpose. d. The design of the consent process is confusing and unclear, in particular the use of "personalisation" instead of "consent" to the use of data. The co

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 25(2) GDPR
Art. 80(2) GDPR
Decision AuthorityLG Berlin
Full Legal Summary

The plaintiff is a nationwide umbrella organisation of consumer centres in Germany. It is a qualified organisation to bring collective redress actions according to german law. The contoller is Google Ireland Ltd, the provider of Google services in the EEA. To use some of the services provided by the defendant, a ‘Google account’ is required. At the sign up process, after users have first entered personal data to create an account, they must choose between 2 "personalisation settings”, “express personalisation" or "manual personalisation". “Express personalisation" consists of a 1 step page that permits personalised advertising while the "manual personalisation" consist of 5 steps that allow the user to select the personal data they want to share. When users log in to their Google account, after completing the registration process, they have the possibility to modify the duration of data storage and reduce it to 3 months. In June 2022 the plaintiff sent the controller an unsuccessful warning letter, arguing that with this sign up process for a Google account, the controller violated Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR since there is a lack of a voluntary, transparent and informed consent for a specific purpose. More specifically; a. The user does not have the option to refuse giving consent in the case of "express personalisation" and that the user is also unaware that they have the option of not giving consent if they return to "manual personalisation". b. In the context of "manual personalisation", the use of personal data in the "personalised advertising" area cannot be completely deselected, as the controller processes the user's "general location" for advertising purposes. c. There is no transparent list of the defendant's services for which consent is given and therefore lack of a specific purpose. d. The design of the consent process is confusing and unclear, in particular the use of "personalisation" instead of "consent" to the use of data. The co

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Google Ireland Ltd in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

25 March 2025

Authority

DPA LGBerlin

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Google Ireland Ltd - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: