- Enforcing jurisdiction
- Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
- Confirmed applicable legislation
- Privacy topics
Court case 8 AZR 117/24 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)
Privacy enforcement record
This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A lawyer sued a university for rejecting his job application based on a past fraud conviction that was overturned. The court found that the university collected information about him without his knowledge and did not inform him, but he was not awarded damages. This case highlights the importance of transparency in how companies handle personal data during hiring processes.
What happened
The university rejected a lawyer's job application based on an overturned fraud conviction without informing him of the data collection.
Who was affected
The lawyer who applied for a position at the university and was rejected due to a past conviction.
What the authority found
The court ruled that the university unlawfully processed the lawyer's personal data without informing him, but he was not entitled to damages.
Why this matters
This ruling emphasizes that companies must be transparent about how they collect and use personal data, especially in hiring. It serves as a reminder for businesses to inform applicants about their data processing practices.
View original scraped data
Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.
Source checks
Linked-source text retrieved.
Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.
Processing notes: authority corrected.
Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources
The data subject is a renowned lawyer specialised in employment law and the controller a university operating as a corporation under public law. In 2020, the data subject was sentenced for fraud by a court of first instance (Regional Court of Munich I). In 2022 the Federal Court of Justice overturned this judgment. In June 2021, the controller advertised a temporary position for a lawyer, to which the data subject applied for, enclosing all relevant documents, and then went through the interview process. In July 2021, the data subject received a rejection notice from the controller, stating that it can be seen from publicly available online sources that the data subject had been sentenced for fraud by the court of first instance. Even though the judgement is not yet legally binding, he could only be hired under the resolutory condition of a clean criminal record. He was also informed that another candidate, who matched the requirements better, had been selected. In December 2022, the data subject filed a case with the Court of First Instance (Düsseldorf Labor Court -ArbG Düsseldorf) claiming, amongst other things, that he is entitled to material and immaterial damages due to the unlawful collection of his personal data. The core of the allegations is that that the controller collected the data from the internet without him being aware, the collected data was incorrect and since the controller did not inform him about the processing he was not given the opportunity to comment which had an influence to the outcome of the selection process. The controller claimed that the position had been filled with another applicant who demonstrated better professional competence in comparison to the data subject. The knowledge of the criminal proceedings against the data subject and their evaluation in relation to the position were additional reasons for the rejection. The data subject is not entitled to damages under Article 82(1) GDPR, because the personal data collection d
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Court case 8 AZR 117/24 in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Ruling Date
5 July 2025
Authority
DPA LAGDsseldorf
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 8 AZR 117/24 - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: