Court case 29 K 6375/25 – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA VGDsseldorf5 September 2025Germany
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

On 16 May 2025, the data subject made an access request to the controller by letter. On 20 May 2025, the controller informed him that his letter had been received and that his request was being examined, but clarification could take time. On 23 June 2025, the data subject brought a case before the court of first instance (Administrative Court Düsseldorf -VG Düsseldorf), claiming that the controller failed to satisfy his request. The court pointed out that the one month deadline in Article 12(3) GDPR only refers to the provision of the status report on the measures taken pursuant to the request. According to the court, it does not set a deadline for the fulfillment of the rights or claims of the data subject enshrined in Articles 15-22 GDPR. In this case the controller provided the data subject with a status report in due time. Therefore, it complied with its obligation to inform the data subject of the measures taken to satisfy his request for information within the one-month period pursuant to Article 12(3) GDPR. The court found the action inadmissible.

GDPR Articles Cited

Art. 12(3) GDPR
Decision AuthorityVG Düsseldorf
Full Legal Summary

On 16 May 2025, the data subject made an access request to the controller by letter. On 20 May 2025, the controller informed him that his letter had been received and that his request was being examined, but clarification could take time. On 23 June 2025, the data subject brought a case before the court of first instance (Administrative Court Düsseldorf -VG Düsseldorf), claiming that the controller failed to satisfy his request. The court pointed out that the one month deadline in Article 12(3) GDPR only refers to the provision of the status report on the measures taken pursuant to the request. According to the court, it does not set a deadline for the fulfillment of the rights or claims of the data subject enshrined in Articles 15-22 GDPR. In this case the controller provided the data subject with a status report in due time. Therefore, it complied with its obligation to inform the data subject of the measures taken to satisfy his request for information within the one-month period pursuant to Article 12(3) GDPR. The court found the action inadmissible.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case 29 K 6375/25 in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

5 September 2025

Authority

DPA VGDsseldorf

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case 29 K 6375/25 - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: