Enforcing jurisdiction
Germany · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband – Court Ruling (Germany, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA LGBerlin19 June 2025Germany
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A German court ruled against ImmobilienScout24 for collecting personal data through a mandatory self-disclosure form without a valid legal basis. The court's decision highlights the importance of obtaining proper consent and being transparent about data collection. This case sets a precedent for how companies must handle user data.

What happened

The court found that ImmobilienScout24 collected personal data without a valid legal basis through a self-disclosure form.

Who was affected

Users of ImmobilienScout24 who were required to fill out the self-disclosure form before contacting landlords.

What the authority found

The court ruled that the company's data processing violated GDPR due to lack of valid consent and necessity.

Why this matters

This ruling emphasizes the need for clear consent and legal grounds for data collection. Companies should review their data practices to ensure compliance with GDPR.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 5(1)(a) GDPR
Art. 6(1) GDPR
Art. 6(1)(a) GDPR

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 5(1), (2) No. 1 UWG
Decision AuthorityLG Berlin

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 20 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

The Federation of German Consumer Organisations (Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband – vzbv) brought an action against ImmobilienScout24 GmbH, the operator of an online real estate platform in Germany. The controller offered users a “self-disclosure form” to fill out before contacting landlords. This form collected extensive personal data, such as name, address, employment details, and income. Some fields were marked as mandatory. The website also promoted credit reports by a German credit information agency (i.e. SCHUFA), stating that landlords increasingly required them before apartment viewings. The vzbv claimed that this practice violated the GDPR because the data were collected without a valid legal basis. It further argued that the SCHUFA advertising was misleading under the German Unfair Competition Act (Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb – UWG), as it falsely suggested that tenants were obliged to provide credit reports at an early stage. Accordingly, vzbv requested two injunctions to stop the processing of personal data in connection with the self-disclosure form and to prohibit misleading advertising about SCHUFA credit reports. The Regional Court of Berlin (Landgericht Berlin – LG Berlin) upheld both claims. It found that the controller’s data processing violated Article 5(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 6(1) GDPR, and that its advertising breached the UWG. The Court held that the controller had no valid legal basis for collecting data via the self-disclosure form. There was no valid consent according to Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, as filling out the form could not be considered voluntary and unambiguous and the processing lacked a specific purpose. Many fields were mandatory and the purpose of processing was only vaguely described. The court also found that the processing was not necessary for pre-contractual measures under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR, as it was not indispensable to initiate rental negotiations. Similarly, the Court rejected that there was a le

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband in DE

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

19 June 2025

Authority

DPA LGBerlin

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband - Germany (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: