Enforcing jurisdiction
Austria · Geography does not establish applicable law.
Confirmed applicable legislation

Court case Ra 2023/04/0117 – Court Ruling (Austria, 2025)

Court Ruling
Datenschutzbehörde8 October 2025Austria
final
Court Ruling

Privacy enforcement record

This record is classified outside cookie consent. Subject classification does not confirm an applicable law. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A court in Austria dismissed a complaint from a person who believed their vaccination data was shared unlawfully. The court ruled that the social insurance institution had the right to process this data under national law. This case is significant because it clarifies the legal basis for processing health data during public health initiatives.

What happened

The court upheld the processing of vaccination data by a social insurance institution based on legal authorizations.

Who was affected

The individual affected was a person who received a COVID-19 vaccination information letter.

What the authority found

The court determined that the processing of the individual's vaccination data was lawful under national law and GDPR.

Why this matters

This ruling reinforces the legal framework for processing health data in public health contexts, highlighting the balance between data protection and public health needs.

Recorded legal citations
Automatically processed
Art. 6 GDPR
Art. 9 GDPR
Art. 14 GDPR
View original scraped data
Art. 6(GDPR)
Art. 9(GDPR)
Art. 14(GDPR)

Original imported citations before automated processing; the processing history does not establish independent verification.

National Law Articles
AI-identified
§ 1 DSG
Decision AuthorityVfGH
Reviewed AuthorityDSB (Austria)

Source checks

Linked-source text retrieved.

Automated check recorded — 23 March 2026.

Processing notes: articles corrected, national law identified, authority corrected.

Retrieved text may be a secondary summary or an announcement. These automated statuses do not establish that the original decision was read or that the record received an independent legal review. How we check sources

Full Legal Summary
Detailed

A data subject received a COVID-19 vaccination information letter sent by the social insurance institution together with the Ministry of Social Affairs, Health, Care and Consumer Protection. Believing that his vaccination status and contact data must have been unlawfully accessed or shared, he filed a complaint with the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB), alleging a violation of his right to confidentiality under [https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10001597&Artikel=1&Paragraf=1&Anlage=&Uebergangsrecht= § 1 DSG] and unlawful processing under Articles 5, 6, and 9 GDPR. He further argued that the controller had failed to comply with the information obligations under Article 14 GDPR, had not concluded a joint-controller agreement with the Ministry, and had not carried out a data protection impact assessment. The DSB dismissed the complaint and the data subject appealed to the Federal Administrative Court, and when that court dismissed his appeal and refused to allow an ordinary revision, he filed an extraordinary appeal with the Supreme Administrative Court. The Supreme Administrative Court examined the data subject’s extraordinary appeal and determined that it raised no legal question of fundamental importance. It agreed with the lower court and the DSB that the social insurance institution, classified as a public law institution, was entitled, under [https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10008147&FassungVom=2021-08-31&Artikel=&Paragraf=750&Anlage=&Uebergangsrecht= national law], to process the data subject’s data from the central vaccination register on the basis of explicit statutory authorizations, which required the identification of unvaccinated insured persons and the sending of official information regarding health risks and available free vaccines. Moreover, because this legal basis met the requirements of Articles 6 and 9 GDPR, no violation of the data subject’s righ

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case Ra 2023/04/0117 in AT

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

8 October 2025

Authority

Datenschutzbehörde

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Automatically normalized and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case Ra 2023/04/0117 - Austria (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: