Child Protection Board – Court Ruling (Netherlands, 2025)
General GDPR enforcement action
This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
A person asked a child protection council to delete their data but faced delays and partial refusals. The court agreed that some data should remain due to public interest but awarded the person compensation for the delay in deleting other data. This case highlights the balance between public interest and individual rights.
What happened
A person requested the deletion of their data from a child protection council, which was only partially granted.
Who was affected
The individual who requested the deletion of their data stored by the child protection council.
What the authority found
The court ruled that while some data must stay for public interest, the council was late in deleting other data, leading to a small compensation for the individual.
Why this matters
This case illustrates the complexities of data deletion requests, especially when public interest is involved. It serves as a reminder for organizations to act promptly on such requests to avoid legal issues.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
The data subject requested the deletion of all his proceedings-related data stored by the child protection council. The council granted the request as to criminal investigations, but not to child protection investigations. The data subject filed a lawsuit with the Court, affirming the controller did not provide sufficient grounds for not deleting child protection investigation data. Moreover, this was accompanied by a claim for damages for deleting criminal investigation data with too big of a delay. The Court partially upheld the complaint. It agreed with the controller that child protection related data fell within the exception of Article 17(3)(b) GDPR, as it amounted to processing carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority under Article 6(1)(e) GDPR. Provisions of national law sufficiently demonstrate the controller’s necessity to process personal data for the performance of its tasks in the public interest. Moreover, the controller adequately demonstrated that they were timely in the deletion of the criminal files, within a month from the request by the data subject. As such, no administrative fine was imposed by the Court. Still, the removal took place more than one year after proceedings, allowing for other government entities to consult the documents, thus causing distress in the data subject. Essentially, the controller was not proactive in the deletion of data about the criminal proceedings. Due to this, the data subject was entitled to symbolic compensation of €125.
Outcome
Court Ruling
A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Child Protection Board in NL
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Child Protection Board - Netherlands (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: