Court case Us I-199/2025-9 – Court Ruling (Croatia, 2025)

Court Ruling
DPA USRijeka13 November 2025Croatia
final
Court Ruling

General GDPR enforcement action

This case relates to broader data protection obligations, not specifically to cookie or consent banner compliance. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

A Croatian court ordered a data protection agency to reconsider a complaint about a personal data breach involving an education inspector. The inspector allegedly shared a person's identity without consent, but the agency initially dismissed the case. This ruling shows that data protection agencies must thoroughly investigate complaints about personal data handling.

What happened

A person complained that an education inspector disclosed their personal data without consent.

Who was affected

The individual whose personal data was allegedly shared by the education inspector.

What the authority found

The court found that the data protection agency must assess whether the person's data was unlawfully processed instead of dismissing the complaint.

Why this matters

This case highlights the responsibility of data protection agencies to investigate complaints properly. It sets a precedent for ensuring that individuals' rights regarding personal data are taken seriously.

GDPR Articles Cited

AI-verified

View original scraped data
Art. 51(GDPR)

Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.

Decision AuthorityUS Rijeka
Source verified 23 March 2026
articles corrected
national law identified
Full Legal Summary
Detailed

On 28 January 2025, the Croatian Personal Data Protection Agency (AZOP) dismissed a complaint from a data subject who alleged that an education inspector had disclosed his personal data to the principal of a music school in Rijeka. The data subject claimed that the inspector copied him on an email to the principal without his consent, revealing his identity and breaching the GDPR and the Croatian implementing act. AZOP rejected the complaint, stating that there were no legal grounds to open a procedure, without assessing whether the data subject’s rights had been violated. They argued that the data subject’s allegations were about breaches of sectoral rules governing inspections, not about GDPR violations and consequently they lacked competence. The data subject challenged this decision before the Administrative Court in Rijeka. The Administrative Court in Rijeka annulled AZOP’s decision and sent the case back for reconsideration. The court held that AZOP could not rule on breaches of the Education Inspection Act or the inspector’s disciplinary responsibilities. However, as an independent supervisory authority under Article 51 GDPR, AZOP was competent and obliged to assess whether the data subject’s personal data had been unlawfully processed. The court found that AZOP should have examined the complaint on its merits rather than dismissing it on procedural grounds. The court required AZOP to establish the full facts, determine if unlawful processing occurred, and issue a substantive decision within 60 days. AZOP was ordered to reimburse the data subject €1,000 for legal costs while other cost claims were denied.

Outcome

Court Ruling

A ruling by a national court on a data-protection matter.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for Court case Us I-199/2025-9 in HR

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Ruling Date

13 November 2025

Authority

DPA USRijeka

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. Court case Us I-199/2025-9 - Croatia (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: