Peter Nowak – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2017)
CJEU precedent (Directive 95/46/EC, pre-GDPR)
This is a Court of Justice judgment predating the GDPR. It interprets Directive 95/46/EC (the Data Protection Directive). It is not a cookie or ePrivacy case and is excluded from cookie statistics and the Risk Calculator.
The Court of Justice of the European Union decided that exam answers are personal data. Peter Nowak, who failed an exam, sought access to his script, which was initially refused. This decision allows individuals to access their exam answers, impacting how educational bodies handle data requests.
What happened
The Court decided that exam answers qualify as personal data.
Who was affected
People like Peter Nowak who request access to their exam scripts.
What the authority found
The Court ruled that exam scripts are personal data under Directive 95/46/EC, granting access rights.
Why this matters
This decision establishes that exam scripts are personal data, requiring educational institutions to comply with access requests. It underscores the need for these bodies to align their practices with data protection laws.
GDPR Articles Cited
The claimant, Peter Nowak, was a trainee accountant who failed one open book examination for the fourth time. He initially tried challenging the result of that examination, but his claim was rejected. Shortly after, he made an access request to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Ireland ('CAI') seeking all the personal data relating to him that it held. In response, the CAI sent him a number of documents, but refused to send him his exam script on the ground that it did not contain personal data within the meaning of the 1995 Data Protection Directive. He then contacted the DPC to challenge the reason given for the refusal to disclose his examination script. It replied to him and stated that "exam scripts do not generally fall to be considered [for data protection purposes] … because this material would not generally constitute personal data". He did not accept this decision and after more exchanges submitted a formal complaint. The DPC informed him it could not identify a contravention of data protection legislation and consequently would not investigate. Thus, he brought an action against that decision in court. The Circuit Court, High Court and Court of Appeal all dismissed his claims. However, the Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, and held that the action brought by Mr Nowak against the decision of the Data Protection Commissioner was admissible. The Supreme Court was nonetheless uncertain whether an examination script can constitute personal data within the meaning of Directive 95/46, so referred the following questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling: # Is information recorded in/as answers given by a candidate during a professional examination capable of being personal data, within the meaning of Directive 95/46? # If the answer to Question 1 is that all or some of such information may be personal data within the meaning of the Directive, what factors are relevant in determining whether in any given case
Outcome
CJEU Judgment
A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Peter Nowak in EU
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Judgment Date
20 December 2017
Authority
Court of Justice of the European Union
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-cjeu-4043About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Peter Nowak - European Union (2017). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: