CJEU case C-807/21 Deutsche Wohnen – CJEU Judgment (Germany, 2023)
CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action
This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Court of Justice ruled against Deutsche Wohnen for failing to properly manage tenant data, which could lead to unauthorized access and misuse. This case is important because it shows that companies must take data protection seriously, especially when handling sensitive tenant information. The ruling sets a precedent for stricter accountability in data management practices.
What happened
Deutsche Wohnen was found to have stored tenant data improperly and failed to ensure its regular deletion.
Who was affected
Tenants whose personal data was improperly stored by Deutsche Wohnen were affected.
What the authority found
The Court determined that Deutsche Wohnen intentionally violated data protection rules by not taking necessary measures to manage tenant data correctly.
Why this matters
This case highlights the need for real estate companies to implement effective data management practices. It sets a standard for accountability in how personal data is handled and stored.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
DW is a listed real estate company and indirectly holds around 163,000 housing units and 3,000 commercial units. The owners of these units are subsidiaries (holding companies) of DW and lease the units to other companies in the group (service companies). DW is only in charge or the central management. DW and the group of companies which it manages process the personal data of the tenants of said units. In 2017, the Berlin DPA informed DW during an on-the-spot inspection that companies within its group were storing personal data in a potentially infringent filing system. The DPA could not tell if it the storage was necessary nor if there were safeguards to ensure the erasure of data which was no longer required. DW told the DPA that it would move data to a more compliant database but this never materialised in practice. In 2019, the DPA fined DW €14,385,000 for intentional infringement of Article 5(1)(a), (c) and (e) and of Article 25(1) GDPR. The DPA found that DW intentionally failed to take the measures needed to allow personal data relating to tenants to be regularly erased or to check whether they had erroneously been stored. It also stated that DW had continued to store the personal data of at least 15 named tenants where such storage was not necessary. DW appealed this decision to Berlin's Regional Court. The court stated that the imposition of a fine on a legal person is regulated by national law (Paragraph 30 of the OWiG).The Act on Regulatory Offences: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_owig/index.html As a requirement for the imposition of the administrative fine against a legal person, German law requires that the original infringement shall be attributed to a natural person that is responsible for the legal person's compliance with the law. The Public Prosecutor's Office in Berlin filed an appeal with Berlin's Higher Regional Court. The Court observed that the limited liability regime of legal persons under national law is incompatible with
Outcome
CJEU Judgment
A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for CJEU case C-807/21 Deutsche Wohnen in DE
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
Judgment Date
5 December 2023
Authority
Court of Justice of the European Union
GDPRhub ID
gdprhub-cjeu-6592About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. CJEU case C-807/21 Deutsche Wohnen - Germany (2023). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: