Marián Kočner – CJEU Judgment (European Union, 2024)
CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action
This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.
The Court of Justice ruled on a case involving Marián Kočner, who sought compensation after his private messages were leaked during a murder investigation. The court found that Europol and the Slovak authorities were not jointly liable for the data leak. This decision is important for understanding how data protection laws apply in criminal investigations.
What happened
Marián Kočner requested €100,000 in compensation for the unauthorized disclosure of his private messages during a murder investigation.
Who was affected
Marián Kočner, whose private communications were leaked, was directly affected by this ruling.
What the authority found
The Court held that Europol and the Slovak authorities could not be held jointly responsible for the data leak under the relevant regulations.
Why this matters
This ruling clarifies the responsibilities of law enforcement agencies regarding data protection during investigations. It signals that individuals may face challenges in seeking compensation for data breaches in such contexts.
GDPR Articles Cited
View original scraped data
Original data from scraper before AI verification against source document.
Following the murder of a Slovak journalist and his fiancée, Mr Ján Kuciak and Ms Martina Kušnírová, in Slovakia on 21 February 2018, the Slovak authorities (Národná kriminálna agentúra (National Crime Agency, Slovakia; ‘NAKA’)) conducted an extensive investigation. At the request of those authorities, the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (‘Europol’) extracted the data stored on two mobile telephones allegedly belonging to Mr Marian Kočner, the data subject, who was prosecuted as an accomplice to that murder for having ordered the killings, following the investigation. Europol sent its scientific reports to those authorities and delivered to them a hard disk containing the encrypted data it had extracted. In one of its reports, Europol stated that Mr Kočner had been detained on suspicion of a financial offence since 2018 and that his name was, inter alia, directly linked to the ‘so-called mafia lists’ and the ‘Panama Papers’. In May 2019, the Slovak press and international network of investigative journalists published a large amount of information relating to Mr Kočner from his mobile telephones, including transcripts of intimate communications exchanged between him and his girlfriend. The conversation was carried by means of encrypted messaging service. For the reasons stated above, Mr Kočner sent a complaint to Europol seeking compensation in the amount of €100,000 as a reparation for the non-material damage on the bases of [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0794 Article 50(1) Regulation 2016/794]. The sought compensation consisted of €50,000 for the unlawful disclosure of data subject's intimate conversation with his girlfriend and €50,000 for the inclusion of his name on the 'mafia list'. Europol and Slovak Republic contended that the arguments are unfounded as, firstly, Regulation 2016/794 (setting up the rules for the Europol) does not provide for such joint liability of Europol and the Member State.
Outcome
CJEU Judgment
A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.
Related Cases (0)
No other cases found for Marián Kočner in EU
This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.
Details
About this data
Cite as: Cookie Fines. Marián Kočner - European Union (2024). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu
Last updated: