CJEU case C-492/23 Russmedia – CJEU Judgment (Romania, 2025)

CJEU Judgment
Court of Justice of the European Union2 December 2025Romania
final
CJEU Judgment

CJEU judgment — not a DPA enforcement action

This is a Court of Justice ruling, not an enforcement action by a data protection authority. It is not included in cookie statistics or the Risk Calculator.

Russmedia Digital (Russmedia), a Romanian company, is the owner of the online marketplace www.publi24.ro on which ads for - inter alia - goods or services from Romania can be published, either free of charge or for a fee. An unidentified person published an ad on that online marketplace, the content of which was disparaging and offensive towards the data subject, stating that it offered sexual services (‘the ad’). That ad contained photographs originating from the data subject's social network account but used for the ad without the data subject's consent. The identity of the person posting that ad was not verified prior to publication. When contacted by the data subject, the controller removed the ad from its online marketplace less than an hour later. However, the same ad has been placed online, indicating the the original source as Russmedia, by other websites with advertising content, where it can still be accessed. = Arguing that the ad at issue infringed her rights, the data subject brought an action against Russmedia. The Court of First Instance upheld that action and ordered Russmedia, on the basis of Romanian law to pay the data subject non-material damage caused to her by the infringement of her right of personal portrayal and right to honour and reputation, the breach of her right to privacy, and the improper processing of her personal data. That court took the view that the ad at issue constituted a failure by Russmedia to meet the obligations imposed on it by the GDPR. However, a specialised court upheld Russmedia’s ensuing appeal, ruling that the action brought by the data subject was unfounded because Russmedia was not the author of the ad at issue. The court held that Russmedia was merely providing a service for storing ads, without being actively involved ‘in the content’ of those ads. That court therefore found that Russmedia was exempted from liability by Romanian law for the damage claimed. = The data subject brought an appeal against that d

GDPR Articles Cited

Decision AuthorityCJEU
Reviewed AuthorityCurtea de Apel Cluj (Romania)
Full Legal Summary

Russmedia Digital (Russmedia), a Romanian company, is the owner of the online marketplace www.publi24.ro on which ads for - inter alia - goods or services from Romania can be published, either free of charge or for a fee. An unidentified person published an ad on that online marketplace, the content of which was disparaging and offensive towards the data subject, stating that it offered sexual services (‘the ad’). That ad contained photographs originating from the data subject's social network account but used for the ad without the data subject's consent. The identity of the person posting that ad was not verified prior to publication. When contacted by the data subject, the controller removed the ad from its online marketplace less than an hour later. However, the same ad has been placed online, indicating the the original source as Russmedia, by other websites with advertising content, where it can still be accessed. = Arguing that the ad at issue infringed her rights, the data subject brought an action against Russmedia. The Court of First Instance upheld that action and ordered Russmedia, on the basis of Romanian law to pay the data subject non-material damage caused to her by the infringement of her right of personal portrayal and right to honour and reputation, the breach of her right to privacy, and the improper processing of her personal data. That court took the view that the ad at issue constituted a failure by Russmedia to meet the obligations imposed on it by the GDPR. However, a specialised court upheld Russmedia’s ensuing appeal, ruling that the action brought by the data subject was unfounded because Russmedia was not the author of the ad at issue. The court held that Russmedia was merely providing a service for storing ads, without being actively involved ‘in the content’ of those ads. That court therefore found that Russmedia was exempted from liability by Romanian law for the damage claimed. = The data subject brought an appeal against that d

Outcome

CJEU Judgment

A judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union, typically on a preliminary reference from a national court.

Related Cases (0)

No other cases found for CJEU case C-492/23 Russmedia in RO

This is the only recorded case for this entity in this jurisdiction.

Details

Judgment Date

2 December 2025

Authority

Court of Justice of the European Union

About this data

Data: GDPRhub (noyb.eu)
Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
AI-verified and classified

Cite as: Cookie Fines. CJEU case C-492/23 Russmedia - Romania (2025). Retrieved from cookiefines.eu

Report Inaccuracy

Last updated: